ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022
Selecting Performance Indicators and Targets in Health Care: An International Scoping Review and Standardized Process Framework.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of decentralisation on health systems: a systematic review of reviews.BMJ global health · 2023Pooled it
- Recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology for the management of chronic kidney disease in primary health care.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaGuideline
- Utilization of stakeholder engagement to inform the identification of leading indicators for clinical research enrollment performance in a large integrated health care system: The VA clinical research enrollment summit.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Welcome to the jungle: collection and evaluation of quality indicators with the QUALICATOR instrument.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Healthcare Quality Systems: International Frameworks, Evaluation and Improvement Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Promoting data-driven decision-making in Jordan: strengthening national health information system and achieving consensus on core set of health system indicators.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Crucial key performance indicators for hospital evaluation: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Setting targets for antibiotic use in general practice in Europe: A scoping review.The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Developing and piloting a set of quality-of-care indicators for Romanian public hospitals as part of a national programme to fund quality.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Multiple case study of processes used by hospitals to select performance indicators: do they align with best practices?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024Article
- Measuring what matters: Context-specific indicators for assessing immunisation performance in Pacific Island Countries and Areas.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- A Potential Indicator for Assessing Patient Blood Management Standard Implementation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Patient Safety Indicator Sets: Prioritization, Decision-Making Considering Healthcare Resilience, and Implementation Success.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Health care organizations monitor hundreds of performance indicators. It is unclear what processes and criteria organizations use to identify the indicators they use, who is involved in these processes, how performance targets are set, and what the impacts of these processes are. The purpose of this study is to synthesize international approaches to indicator selection and develop a standardized process framework. Methods: Using the PubMed and Web of Science search engines, a scoping review of peer reviewed and grey literature following PRISMA-ScR guidelines was conducted to identify documents describing indicator selection processes used by health systems. English-language papers from 11 countries published from 2010 to 2020 were included. Papers were thematically analyzed to develop a standardized process framework. Results: The review included 33 peer-reviewed papers and 11 grey-literature documents. While there are common practices used in health care to select indicators, no single standardized process framework for indicator selection exists. Arbitrary or incomplete indicator selection processes risk over-measurement, lack of alignment with strategic and operational goals, lack of support by end-users, and paralyzed decision-making ability. By consolidating international practices, we developed the 5-P indicator selection process framework to mitigate process risks and support high-quality indicator selection processes. Conclusion: The 5-P indicator selection process framework consists of five domains and 17 elements, and offers health care agencies a practical structure they can use to design indicator selection processes. The framework also provides researchers with a basis by which the implementation of these processes may be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.