ArticleRSC advances2021
Realizing new designs of multiplexed electrode chips by 3-D printed masks.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Submicron microdevice patterning with plasma-thinned nail-polish microfiber shadow masks.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of On-Site Rapid Detection Methods for Antibiotic Residues in Aquatic Products (2021-2025).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D-printed shadow masks for micro-patterned electrodes.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Single-Response Duplexing of Electrochemical Label-Free Biosensor from the Same Tag.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Investigating electrochemical deposition of gold on commercial off-the-shelf 3-D printing materials towards developing sensing applications.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Metallization of Recycled Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Processed by UV-Assisted 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Creating small and portable analytical methods is a fast-growing field of research. Devices capable of performing bio-analytical detection are especially desirable with the onset of the global pandemic. Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) technologies, including rapid point-of-care (POC) devices such as glucose sensors, are attractive for applications in resource-poor settings. There are many challenges in creating such devices, from sensitive molecular designs to stable conditions for storing the sensor chips. In this study we have explored using three-dimensional (3D) printing to create shadow masks as a low-cost method to produce multiplexed electrodes by physical vapour deposition. Although the dimensional resolution of the electrodes produced by using 3D printed masks is inferior to those made through photolithography-based techniques, their dimensions can be readily tailored ranging from 1 mm to 3 mm. Multiple mask materials were tested, such as polylactic acid and polyethylene terephthalate glycol, with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene shown to be the best. Simple strategies in making chip holders by 3D printing and controlling working electrode surface area with epoxy glue were also investigated. The prepared chips were tested by performing surface chemistry with thiol-containing molecules and monitoring the signals electrochemically.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.