ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022
Thyroidectomy Using the Lateral Cervical Small Incision Approach for Early Thyroid Cancer.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral mini-incision via cervical midline approach versus traditional incision for unilateral thyroid cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: safety and feasibility.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Clinico-pathological initial outcome of a newly adopted novel surgical technique for nodal metastatic thyroid cancer at a large-volume centre in a high-income developing country.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Comparisons of different approaches and incisions of thyroid surgery and selection strategy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Surgical resection is the main treatment for thyroid cancer, but while traditional open thyroidectomy improves prognosis, it also results in poor cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, we devised the lateral cervical small incision approach to thyroidectomy and will evaluate its efficacy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 191 patients who underwent unilateral thyroidectomy and isthmusectomy for early thyroid cancer were collected retrospectively. Of these, 100 patients underwent a traditional thyroidectomy using the median cervical approach (control group), and 91 patients underwent a thyroidectomy using the lateral cervical small incision approach (experimental group). The differences in perioperative prognosis, postoperative complications, and cosmetic outcomes between the two groups were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference in sex, age, tumor size, lymph node dissection, number of metastases, or postoperative complications between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the duration of the operation; postoperative blood loss, drainage, and hospital stay; and scar color, blood circulation, hardness, and thickness between the groups (P < 0.05). The cosmetic outcomes of the incisions in the experimental group were more satisfactory than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: When compared with traditional open thyroidectomy, the lateral cervical small incision approach has a lower incidence of complications, a better perioperative prognosis, and an improved cosmetic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.