Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478727›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Outcomes of Interventions for Angiosarcoma.

Qi Yan, Roman A Fernandez, Maryam Elmi, Jonathan Gelfond, Mark G Davies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Extensive Bruise on the Hemiface: CARE Clinical Case.The journal of international advanced otology · 2025
    Article
  5. Bladder angiosarcoma: a systematic literature review and survival analysis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi YanDepartment of Surgery, Long School of Medicine University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Roman A FernandezDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Long School of Medicine University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Maryam ElmiDepartment of Surgery, Long School of Medicine University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Jonathan GelfondDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Long School of Medicine University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Mark G DaviesDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Long School of Medicine University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Angiosarcoma is a rare malignant vascular tumor, and the management and outcome of this disease are not well-described. The aim of this study was to report the incidence, patient demographics, and outcomes of angiosarcoma based on national data. Methods: Data on patients with angiosarcoma were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) were used to assess the survival benefit of operation with additional chemo or radiation therapy compared to operation alone. These variables were further compared against patients who did not receive an operation despite being initially offered one. Cox regression was used to assess survival. Statistical analyses were performed on RStudio. Results: For this study, 5,135 patients (46% men; median age 69, range 0-102) with angiosarcoma were identified in the SEER database between 1975 and 2016. The age-adjusted incidence rate was 1-4%. Patients were mostly non-Hispanic Caucasian (75.4%). The average tumor size was 4.7 cm, range (.1-98.9). Tumor grades were high at presentation (Grade III 17.2, Grade IV 19, and unknown 50.6%), but half were considered localized tumors. Most patients underwent an operation (66.1%). In 5.6% of patients, the operation was recommended but not performed. The overall 5-year survival was 26.7% (95% CI 25.4-28.1%). IPTW with adjusted Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated worse survival, showing that operation compared to no operation and operation with chemo/radiation compared to operation alone had worse survival between months 0 and 25 but had improved survival after month 25. Conclusions: The incidence of angiosarcoma is low and long-term survival is poor. Multimodal therapy in the form of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemo/radiation therapy offers significant long-term survival benefits over operation alone.

Indexed as

angiosarcomainterventionoutcomesregistrysurvival

Identifiers

PMID35478727
PMCPMC9035688
OpenAlexW4223642629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.