Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478712›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

Value of Histogram of Gray-Scale Ultrasound Image in Differential Diagnosis of Small Triple Negative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Fibroadenoma.

Maolin Xu, Fang Li, Shaonan Yu, Shue Zeng, Gaolong Weng, Peihong Teng, Huimin Yang, Xuefeng Li, Guifeng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maolin Xu *Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Fang Li *Department of Ultrasound, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Shaonan Yu *Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Shue Zeng *Department of Ultrasound, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Gaolong WengDepartment of Ultrasound, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Peihong TengDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Huimin YangDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Xuefeng LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Guifeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of gray-scale ultrasound (US) image histogram in the differential diagnosis between small (≤2.00 cm), oval, or round triple negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) and fibroadenoma (FA). Methods: Fifty-five cases of triple negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC group) and 57 cases of breast fibroadenoma (FA group) confirmed by pathology in Hubei cancer hospital from September 2017 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The gray-scale US images were analyzed by histogram analysis method, from which some parameters (including mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis and 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th and 99th percentile) can be obtained. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter observer reliability of histogram parameters. Histogram parameters between the TN-IDC and FA groups were compared using independent Student's Results: All the histogram parameters showed excellent inter-reader consistency, with the ICC values ranged from 0.883 to 0.999. The mean value, 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th and 99th percentiles of TN-IDC group were significantly lower than those of FA group (P < 0.05). The area under ROC curve (AUC) values of mean and n percentiles were from 0.807 to 0.848. However, there were no significant differences in variance, skewness and kurtosis between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Histogram analysis of gray-scale US images can well distinguish small, oval, or round TN-IDC from FA.

Indexed as

fibroadenomahistogramtriple negative breast cancerultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35478712
PMCPMC9038159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.