Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478703›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic reviews2021

SAFETY AND RELIABILITY OF CARBON-PEEK PLATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Michela Saracco, Camillo Fulchignoni, Calogero Velluto, Lorenzo Rocchi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carbon-fibre plates for traumatic and (impending) pathological fracture fixation: Where do we stand? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michela SaraccoDepartment of Orthopaedics - Hand Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
Camillo FulchignoniDepartment of Orthopaedics - Hand Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
Calogero VellutoDepartment of Orthopaedics - Hand Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
Lorenzo RocchiDepartment of Orthopaedics - Hand Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Distal radius fractures are one of the most common injuries. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are the most diffused between surgical treatments. Carbon-fiber reinforced (CFR) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates have been proposed to prevent effects linked to stainless steel or titanium alloy traditional plates, such as radio-opacity, mismatch of bone-plate elasticity modulus, corrosion, limited fatigue life, osseointegration. Objective: This review aims to evaluate the actual safety and reliability of CFR- PEEK plates to treat distal radius fractures. Methods: Electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholars, and Cochrane Library were searched in December 2020. Eligible studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Three authors independently selected relevant articles and discussed those. Searching identified 13 titles and abstracts, 11 manuscripts were considered eligible for the full-text analysis. Of these 11 papers, 7 studies were included in our review. Results: 215 patients were analyzed in this systematic review. The mean age of enrolled patients was 52,8 years. 34% were males and 66% were females. Fractures were classified according to AO/ASIF classification system. We reported 12 cases of complications specific to this device, such as intraoperative plate and screws rupture, erosive flexor tendons synovitis, and loosening. Conclusion: CFR-PEEK distal radius plates are potentially an alternative to traditional ones. But we believe that the use of this device does not entail a significant advantage in the treatment of distal radius fractures, as safe and low-cost traditional devices are available. Further comparative studies are needed to demonstrate the superiority of carbon devices.

Indexed as

carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK platecarbon fibers materialsdistal radius fractureopen reduction and internal fixation

Identifiers

PMID35478703
PMCPMC9037658
OpenAlexW3205230161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.