ReviewRSC advances2021
Nanoarchitectonics on living cells.
Review in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoformulations in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications: Green Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A Micrometric Transformer: Compositional Nanoshell Transformation of FeAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Polydopamine coating of living diatom microalgae.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022Article
- Biomimetic and Biological Nanoarchitectonics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Donors for nerve transplantation in craniofacial soft tissue injuries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Regulation of stem cell fate and function by using bioactive materials with nanoarchitectonics for regenerative medicine.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2022Review
- Bio-interactive nanoarchitectonics with two-dimensional materials and environments.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2022Review
- Nanoarchitectonics for Hierarchical Fullerene Nanomaterials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review article, the recent examples of nanoarchitectonics on living cells are briefly explained. Not limited to conventional polymers, functional polymers, biomaterials, nanotubes, nanoparticles (conventional and magnetic ones), various inorganic substances, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and other advanced materials have been used as components for nanoarchitectonic decorations for living cells. Despite these artificial processes, the cells can remain active or remain in hibernation without being killed. In most cases, basic functions of the cells are preserved and their resistances against external assaults are much enhanced. The possibilities of nanoarchitectonics on living cells would be high, equal to functional modifications with conventional materials. Living cells can be regarded as highly functionalized objects and have indispensable contributions to future materials nanoarchitectonics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.