ReviewRSC advances2021
Recent advances in biological nanopores for nanopore sequencing, sensing and comparison of functional variations in MspA mutants.
Review in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatic and computational biophysics tools for nanopore engineering: a review from standard approaches to machine learning advancements.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- NanoporeDB: a structural resource of multimeric protein nanopores for single-molecule sensing.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Protein Analyte Sensing with an Outer Membrane Protein G (OmpG) Nanopore.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Comparison among Amber-ff14SB, Amber-ff19SB, and CHARMM36 Force Fields for Ionic and Electroosmotic Flows in Biological Nanopores.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Genetic Code Expansion: Recent Developments and Emerging Applications.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based classification of peptide analytes from single-channel nanopore translocation events.PloS one · 2025Article
- Unzipping of knotted DNA via nanopore translocation.QRB discovery · 2025Article
- Nanopipettes as a Potential Diagnostic Tool for Selective Nanopore Detection of Biomolecules.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Nanopore strand-specific mismatch enables de novo detection of bacterial DNA modifications.Genome research · 2024Article
- Dissecting the Membrane Association Mechanism of Aerolysin Pores at Femtomolar Concentrations Using Water as a Probe.Nano letters · 2024Article
- Classification and applications of nanomaterialsHeliyon · 2024Review
- Detection of Biomolecules Using Solid-State Nanopores Fabricated by Controlled Dielectric Breakdown.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- StringFix: an annotation-guided transcriptome assembler improves the recovery of amino acid sequences from RNA-Seq reads.Genes & genomics · 2023Article
- Article
- Polymer Translocation and Nanopore Sequencing: A Review of Advances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Nanopore Detection of Cancer Biomarkers: A Challenge to Science.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological nanopores are revolutionizing human health by the great myriad of detection and diagnostic skills. Their nano-confined area and ingenious shape are suitable to investigate a diverse range of molecules that were difficult to identify with the previous techniques. Additionally, high throughput and label-free detection of target analytes instigated the exploration of new bacterial channel proteins such as Fragaceatoxin C (FraC), Cytolysin A (ClyA), Ferric hydroxamate uptake component A (FhuA) and Curli specific gene G (CsgG) along with the former ones, like α-hemolysin (αHL),
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.