Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478499›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2022

Prioritizing intervention measures to prevent inappropriate self-medication practices using the Analytical Hierarchy Process.

Birendra Shrivastava, Omi Bajracharya, Rajani Shakya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Social Determinants of Health and Antibiotic Consumption.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Birendra ShrivastavaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jaipur National University, Jagatpura, Jaipur 302017, India.
Omi BajracharyaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Imadol, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Rajani ShakyaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Science, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Jaipur National University · INKathmandu University · NPKIST Medical College · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3 outlines the target of reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by one third through prevention and treatment by 2030. In low and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nepal, a significant number of people do not have accessible and affordable healthcare services available to them, leading to self-medication practices (SMP). Limited numbers of health professionals, ineffective regulation and easy availability of prescription medicines encourage the use of inappropriate SMP, which could result in health risks. Objectives: The objection of the study is to test the application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for prioritizing the intervention measures for preventing inappropriate SMP. Methods: The 25 experts were included in the study, out of which only 16 experts passed the consistency test. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire by the application of AHP model for ranking the intervention measures for preventing inappropriate SMP from March 2020 to May 2020. During this process, the purposively selected experts compared seven intervention measures based on three criteria: control use of prescription and non-prescription medicine, knowledge regarding the medicine and its use, and minimizing healthcare cost. Result: The criteria, "control use of prescription and non-prescription medicine" was judged 3.58 times and 1.53 times more important than to "minimize the healthcare cost" and "knowledge regarding the medicine and its use" respectively. "Regulation of prescription and non-prescription dispensing practice" was the most prioritized intervention measure to prevent inappropriate SMP with a priority score of 20.68% followed by the "accessibility of healthcare system" (19.27%) and "awareness program for the consumers" (17.13%). Conclusion: The AHP method can be used in decision-making related to prioritizing the intervention measures to prevent inappropriate SMP. Among the seven intervention measures considered, "regulation of prescription and non-prescription dispensing practice" was the most preferred intervention measure to improve SMP followed by "access to healthcare" and an "awareness program".

Indexed as

AHP, Analytical Hierarchy ProcessAnalytical Hierarchy ProcessCI, Consistency IndexCR, consistency ratioIntervention measuresLMICs, low and middle-income countriesOTC, Over–The-CounterPOM, Prescription-only-medicinesPrioritizationSelf-medicationSMP, Self-Medication PracticesWHO, World Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID35478499
PMCPMC9030320
OpenAlexW4214570084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.