Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478498›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2022

PD-L1 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis of a Series of 1401 Cases Using Both the 22C3 and SP142 Assays.

Harriet Evans, Brendan O'Sullivan, Frances Hughes, Kathryn Charles, Lee Robertson, Philippe Taniere, Salvador Diaz-Cano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harriet EvansMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Brendan O'SullivanMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Frances HughesMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Kathryn CharlesMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lee RobertsonMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Philippe TaniereMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Salvador Diaz-CanoMolecular Pathology Diagnostic Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) drugs are a novel, effective treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Worldwide, several different ICB drugs are approved, each developed and clinically validated with a specific PD-L1 compound diagnostic assay. As a result, PD-L1 testing workflows in routine practice are complex: requiring multiple assays across two platforms, with each assay having a different method of interpretation. Our service tested 1,401 urothelial carcinoma cases for PD-L1 expression, using both the 22C3 PharmDx assay (required prior to Pembrolizumab therapy) and SP142 assay (required prior to Atezolizumab therapy). Of the 1,401 cases tested, 621 cases (44%) were tested with both the 22C3 PharmDx and SP142 assays, 492 cases (35%) with 22C3 PharmDx only, and 288 cases (21%) with SP142 only. Each assay was used and interpreted according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The rate of positivity we observed was 26% with the 22C3 assay and 31% with the SP142 assay, similar to the pre-licensing studies for both drugs. The discrepancy observed between the assays was 11%, which reinforces the requirement for utilisation of the correct assay for each agent, and limits potential cross-utility of assays. This aspect must be considered when setting up a PD-L1 testing strategy in laboratories where both Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab are available for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma but also has broader implications for testing of other cancers where multiple ICB drugs and their respective assays are approved.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellLung NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleB7-H1 AntigenAtezolizumabPD-L1Pembrolizumabpredictive markerurothelial bladder carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35478498
PMCPMC9036367
OpenAlexW4223420764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.