Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478281›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2022

Comparison of Actinobacteria communities from human-impacted and pristine karst caves.

Andrea Buresova-Faitova, Jan Kopecky, Marketa Sagova-Mareckova, Lise Alonso, Florian Vautrin, Yvan Moënne-Loccoz, Veronica Rodriguez-Nava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea Buresova-FaitovaCNRS, INRAe, VetAgro Sup, UMR 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-8702
Jan KopeckyLaboratory for Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-257X
Marketa Sagova-MareckovaLaboratory for Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0331-8570
Lise AlonsoCNRS, INRAe, VetAgro Sup, UMR 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4137-9876
Florian VautrinCNRS, INRAe, VetAgro Sup, UMR 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0521-6057
Yvan Moënne-LoccozCNRS, INRAe, VetAgro Sup, UMR 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9817-1953
Veronica Rodriguez-NavaCNRS, INRAe, VetAgro Sup, UMR 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-2441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actinobacteria are important cave inhabitants, but knowledge of how anthropization and anthropization-related visual marks affect this community on cave walls is lacking. We compared Actinobacteria communities among four French limestone caves (Mouflon, Reille, Rouffignac, and Lascaux) ranging from pristine to anthropized, and within Lascaux Cave between marked (wall visual marks) and unmarked areas in different rooms (Sas-1, Passage, Apse, and Diaclase). In addition to the 16S rRNA gene marker, 441 bp fragments of the hsp65 gene were used and an hsp65-related taxonomic database was constructed for the identification of Actinobacteria to the species level by Illumina-MiSeq analysis. The hsp65 marker revealed higher resolution for species and higher richness (99% operational taxonomic units cutoff) versus the 16S rRNA gene; however, more taxa were identified at higher taxonomic ranks. Actinobacteria communities varied between Mouflon and Reille caves (both pristine), and Rouffignac and Lascaux (both anthropized). Rouffignac displayed high diversity of Nocardia, suggesting human inputs, and Lascaux exhibited high Mycobacterium relative abundance, whereas Gaiellales were typical in pristine caves and the Diaclase (least affected area of Lascaux Cave). Within Lascaux, Pseudonocardiaceae dominated on unmarked walls and Streptomycetaceae (especially Streptomyces mirabilis) on marked walls, indicating a possible role in mark formation. A new taxonomic database  was developed. Although not all Actinobacteria species were represented, the use of the hsp65 marker enabled species-level variations of the Actinobacteria community to be documented based on the extent of anthropogenic pressure. This approach proved effective when comparing different limestone caves or specific conditions within one cave.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaCavesBacteriaCalcium CarbonateHumansPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCalcium CarbonateRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingActinobacteriacave anthropizationhsp65 sequencingmetabarcodingPaleolithic cave

Identifiers

PMID35478281
PMCPMC8988830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.