Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478267›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2022

Methods for assessing the quality of AM fungal bio-fertilizer: Retrospect and future directions.

R Agnihotri, M P Sharma, H Bucking, J F Dames, D J Bagyaraj

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the efficient propagation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R AgnihotriICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, 452001, Indore, India.
M P SharmaICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, 452001, Indore, India. mahaveer620@gmail.com.
H BuckingDivision of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 65211, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
J F DamesDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, 6140, Makhanda, Grahamstown, South Africa.
D J BagyarajCentre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development, 41 RBI Colony, Anand Nagar, 560024, Bengaluru, India. djbagyaraj@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-2081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recent past, the mass production of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi has bloomed into a large biofertilizer industry. Due to their obligate symbiotic nature, these fungi are propagated on living roots in substrate-based pot cultures and RiTDNA in in vitro or root organ culture systems. The quality assessment of AM inocula remains critical for the production and efficacy evaluation of AM fungi. The vigour of AM inocula are assessed through microscopic methods such as inoculum potential, infectivity potential/infection units, most probable number (MPN) and spore density. These methods marginally depend on the researcher's skill. The signature lipids specific to AM fungi, e.g. 16:1ω5cis ester-linked, phospholipid, and neutral lipid fatty acids provide more robustness and reproducibility. The quantitative real-time PCR of AM fungal taxa specific primers and probes analyzing gene copy number is also increasingly used. This article intends to sensitize AM fungal researchers and inoculum manufacturers to various methods of assessing the quality of AM inocula addressing their merits and demerits. This will help AM producers to fulfil the regulatory requirements ensuring the supply of high-quality AM inocula to end-users, and tap a new dimension of AM research in the commercial production of AM fungi and its application in sustainable plant production systems.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeFertilizersPlantsReproducibility of ResultsSymbiosisFertilizersAM fungiAM signature lipidsInoculum potentialMass productionMicroscopic methods

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.