Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478261›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2022

Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year.

Vasileios Angelomenos, Maziar Mohaddes, Raed Itayem, Bita Shareghi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06525610 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Bone Displacement Under Loading Following Periprosthetic Fracture Repair With Weight-Bearing CT

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2024 to 2025Enrolled21ConditionsPeriprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant KneeArmsPeriprosthetic Fracture Knee Repaired CT Scans
NCT06909916 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Bone Displacement Under Loading Following Distal Femur Periprosthetic Fracture Repair With Weight-Bearing CT and Conventional CT

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPeriprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint ImplantArmsPeriprosthetic Fracture Knee Repaired CT Scans
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inducible displacement of cementless total knee arthroplasty components with conventional and weight-bearing CT-based radiostereometric analysis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Comparison of Marker-Based RSA and CT-RSA for Analyzing Micromotions After Distal Radius Osteotomy: A 1-Year Retrospective Study of 24 Patients.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Accuracy and precision of Volumetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA) is similar to RSA for tibial component migration in TKA.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vasileios AngelomenosDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. vasileios.angelomenos@vgregion.se.
Maziar MohaddesDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. maziar.mohaddes@gmail.com.
Raed ItayemDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. raed.itayem@vgregion.se.
Bita ShareghiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. bita.shareghi@vgregion.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeComputed tomography micromotion analysis (CTMA) can be used to determine implant micro-movements using low-dose CT scans. By using CTMA, a non-invasive measurement of joint implant movement is enabled. We evaluated the precision of CTMA in measuring early cup migration. Standard marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used as reference. We hypothesised that CTMA can be used as an alternative to RSA in assessing implant micromotions. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe included 30 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Acetabular cup migration at 1 year was measured with RSA and CTMA. To determine the precision of both methods, 20 double examinations (postoperatively) with repositioning of the patients were performed. The precision was calculated from zero by assuming that there was no motion of the prosthesis between the 2 examinations.

resultsThe precision of RSA ranged from 0.06 to 0.15 mm for translations and 0.21° to 0.63° for rotations. Corresponding values for CTMA were 0.06 to 0.13 mm and 0.23° to 0.35°. A good level of agreement was found between the methods regarding cup migration and rotation at 1 year.

interpretationThe precision of CTMA in measuring acetabular cup migration and rotation is comparable to marker-based RSA. CTMA could possibly thus be used as an alternative method to detect early implant migration.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipRadiostereometric AnalysisAcetabulumHumansProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35478261
PMCPMC9047498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.