Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478249›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2022

All-optical interrogation of neural circuits in behaving mice.

Lloyd E Russell, Henry W P Dalgleish, Rebecca Nutbrown, Oliver M Gauld, Dustin Herrmann, Mehmet Fişek, Adam M Packer, Michael Häusser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nonlinear Dendritic Integration Supports Up-Down States in Single Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Local Differences in Network Organization in the Auditory and Parietal Cortex, Revealed with Single Neuron Activation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. A large field of view 2- and 3-photon microscope.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lloyd E Russell *Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Henry W P Dalgleish *Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca NutbrownWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Oliver M GauldWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Dustin HerrmannWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-540X
Mehmet FişekWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Adam M PackerWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK. adampacker@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-794X
Michael HäusserWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK. m.hausser@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-8957

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 201225Wellcome Trust 201225/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 204651/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances combining two-photon calcium imaging and two-photon optogenetics with computer-generated holography now allow us to read and write the activity of large populations of neurons in vivo at cellular resolution and with high temporal resolution. Such 'all-optical' techniques enable experimenters to probe the effects of functionally defined neurons on neural circuit function and behavioral output with new levels of precision. This greatly increases flexibility, resolution, targeting specificity and throughput compared with alternative approaches based on electrophysiology and/or one-photon optogenetics and can interrogate larger and more densely labeled populations of neurons than current voltage imaging-based implementations. This protocol describes the experimental workflow for all-optical interrogation experiments in awake, behaving head-fixed mice. We describe modular procedures for the setup and calibration of an all-optical system (~3 h), the preparation of an indicator and opsin-expressing and task-performing animal (~3-6 weeks), the characterization of functional and photostimulation responses (~2 h per field of view) and the design and implementation of an all-optical experiment (achievable within the timescale of a normal behavioral experiment; ~3-5 h per field of view). We discuss optimizations for efficiently selecting and targeting neuronal ensembles for photostimulation sequences, as well as generating photostimulation response maps from the imaging data that can be used to examine the impact of photostimulation on the local circuit. We demonstrate the utility of this strategy in three brain areas by using different experimental setups. This approach can in principle be adapted to any brain area to probe functional connectivity in neural circuits and investigate the relationship between neural circuit activity and behavior.

Indexed as

HolographyOptogeneticsAnimalsBrainCalciumMiceNeuronsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID35478249
PMCPMC7616378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.