Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478233›Full record

ReviewNature2022

FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research.

Matthias Scheffler, Martin Aeschlimann, Martin Albrecht, Tristan Bereau, Hans-Joachim Bungartz, Claudia Felser, Mark Greiner, Axel Groß, Christoph T Koch, Kurt Kremer and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Generative Models for Crystalline Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Enduring Relevance of Semiempirical Quantum Mechanics.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Matthias SchefflerPhysics Department and IRIS Adlershof, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-9873
Martin AeschlimannDepartment of Physics and Research Center OPTIMAS, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-5029
Martin AlbrechtLeibniz-Institut für Kristallzüchtung, Berlin, Germany.
Tristan BereauMax-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, Mainz, Germany.
Hans-Joachim BungartzDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claudia FelserMax Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-2063
Mark GreinerMax Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4363-7189
Axel GroßInstitute of Theoretical Chemistry, Ulm University and Helmholtz-Institute Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-7331
Christoph T KochPhysics Department and IRIS Adlershof, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-1523
Kurt KremerMax-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, Mainz, Germany.
Wolfgang E NagelComputer Science Department, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Markus ScheidgenPhysics Department and IRIS Adlershof, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christof WöllInstitute of Functional Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1078-3304
Claudia DraxlPhysics Department and IRIS Adlershof, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. claudia.draxl@physik.hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-6657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prosperity and lifestyle of our society are very much governed by achievements in condensed matter physics, chemistry and materials science, because new products for sectors such as energy, the environment, health, mobility and information technology (IT) rely largely on improved or even new materials. Examples include solid-state lighting, touchscreens, batteries, implants, drug delivery and many more. The enormous amount of research data produced every day in these fields represents a gold mine of the twenty-first century. This gold mine is, however, of little value if these data are not comprehensively characterized and made available. How can we refine this feedstock; that is, turn data into knowledge and value? For this, a FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) data infrastructure is a must. Only then can data be readily shared and explored using data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) methods. Making data 'findable and AI ready' (a forward-looking interpretation of the acronym) will change the way in which science is carried out today. In this Perspective, we discuss how we can prepare to make this happen for the field of materials science.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData Science

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.