Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478096›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine & research2022

Management of Osteoporosis and Spinal Fractures: Contemporary Guidelines and Evolving Paradigms.

Nasvin Imamudeen, Amjad Basheer, Anoop Mohamed Iqbal, Nihal Manjila, Nisha Nigil Haroon, Sunil Manjila

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine & research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Application and prospects of nanomaterials in osteoporosis treatment.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nasvin ImamudeenDepartment of Medicine, Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Amjad BasheerDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut, CT, USA.
Anoop Mohamed IqbalDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Nihal ManjilaDepartment of History and Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Nisha Nigil HaroonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ayer Neuroscience Institute, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, New Britain, Connecticut, USA.
Sunil ManjilaDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA sunil.manjila@gmail.com.
Case Western Reserve University · USMarshfield Clinic · USThe Hospital of Central Connecticut · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians involved in treating spine fractures secondary to osteopenia and osteoporosis should know the pathogenesis and current guidelines on managing the underlying diminished bone mineral density, as worldwide fracture prevention campaigns are trailing behind in meeting their goals. This is a narrative review exploring the various imaging and laboratory tests used to diagnose osteoporotic fractures and a comprehensive compilation of contemporary medical and surgical management. We have incorporated salient recommendations from the Endocrine Society, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE), and the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). The use of modern scoring systems such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) for evaluating fracture risk in osteoporosis with a 10-year probability of hip fracture and major fractures in the spine, forearm, hip, or shoulder is highlighted. This osteoporosis risk assessment tool can be easily incorporated into the preoperative bone health optimization strategies, especially before elective spine surgery in osteoporotic patients. The role of primary surgical intervention for vertebral compression fracture and secondary fracture prevention with pharmacological therapy is described, with randomized clinical trial-based wisdom on its timing and dosage, drug holiday, adverse effects, and relevant evidence-based literature. We also aim to present an evidence-based clinical management algorithm for treating osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures, tumor-induced osteoporosis, or hardware stabilization in elderly trauma patients in the setting of their impaired bone health. The recent guidelines and recommendations on surgical intervention by various medical societies are covered, along with outcome studies that reveal the efficacy of cement augmentation of vertebral compression fractures via vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty versus conservative medical management in the elderly population.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionKyphoplastyOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyAgedHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomebone densityCement augmentationKyphoplastyOsteoporosisPostmenopausalSpinal fractures

Identifiers

PMID35478096
PMCPMC9242734
OpenAlexW4225105821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.