Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2022
Hyaluronic Acid Gel Injection for the Treatment of Tear Trough Deformity: A Multicenter, Observational, Single-Blind Study.
Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications of Periorbital Cosmetic Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections: A Major ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Post-Blepharoplasty Volume Restoration and Complication Management: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Microneedle for Botulinum Toxin: A Randomized, Case-control, Single-blind Study to Assess Clinical Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Autologous Cell-Free Fat Extract: A Novel Approach for Infraorbital Rejuvenation-A Pilot Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Static and Dynamic Filler-Associated Tear Trough Deformities: Manifestations and Treatment Algorithm.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Fat or fillers: The dilemma in eyelid surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Review
- Modern blepharoplasty: From bench to bedside.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyaluronic acid (HA) gel injections were first used to treat the tear trough in 2005 and since then it has been a mainstay of the approach to lower eyelid deformities.
objectiveThe authors present this retrospective multicentric observational study based on single-blind objective and subjective evaluation and patient satisfaction in relation to the aesthetic improvement of a large group of patients treated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2016 and December 2019, 600 patients (468 women and 132 men), were enrolled in this study, and 1200 tear trough deformities were treated with both needle and cannula techniques.
resultsAverage follow-up time was 12 ± 1 months, and the outcomes were assessed both objectively and subjectively with respect to Hirmand's classification. Statistical analysis shows an inverse correlation between age and class amelioration.
conclusionHA injection of the tear trough is most effective in patients between 30 and 40 years of age, while its benefits extend to up to 50 years old; afterward, it should no longer be the treatment of choice. This confirms that correction of tear trough with hyaluronic acid injections may provide an option to achieve immediate and durable results for up to one year after the injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.