Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35478011›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2022

Nucleus accumbens D1-receptors regulate and focus transitions to reward-seeking action.

Laura L Grima, Marios C Panayi, Oliver Härmson, Emilie C J Syed, Sanjay G Manohar, Masud Husain, Mark E Walton

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Lost in translation: why don't dopamine D2 antagonists cure addictions?Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura L GrimaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. grimal@janelia.hhmi.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-4741
Marios C PanayiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-5638
Oliver HärmsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emilie C J SyedDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sanjay G ManoharDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-4349
Masud HusainDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-9255
Mark E WaltonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mark.walton@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0117-2894

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V036858/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202831/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206330/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT090051MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that dopamine transmission is integral in mediating the influence of reward expectations on reward-seeking actions. However, the precise causal role of dopamine transmission in moment-to-moment reward-motivated behavioral control remains contentious, particularly in contexts where it is necessary to refrain from responding to achieve a beneficial outcome. To examine this, we manipulated dopamine transmission pharmacologically as rats performed a Go/No-Go task that required them to either make or withhold action to gain either a small or large reward. D1R Stimulation potentiated cue-driven action initiation, including fast impulsive actions on No-Go trials. By contrast, D1R blockade primarily disrupted the successful completion of Go trial sequences. Surprisingly, while after global D1R blockade this was characterized by a general retardation of reward-seeking actions, nucleus accumbens core (NAcC) D1R blockade had no effect on the speed of action initiation or impulsive actions. Instead, fine-grained analyses showed that this manipulation decreased the precision of animals' goal-directed actions, even though they usually still followed the appropriate response sequence. Strikingly, such "unfocused" responding could also be observed off-drug, particularly when only a small reward was on offer. These findings suggest that the balance of activity at NAcC D1Rs plays a key role in enabling the rapid activation of a focused, reward-seeking state to enable animals to efficiently and accurately achieve their goal.

Indexed as

DopamineNucleus AccumbensAnimalsMotivationRatsReceptors, Dopamine D1RewardDopamineReceptors, Dopamine D1

Identifiers

PMID35478011
PMCPMC9283443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.