Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477986›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2022

Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Yeon Gyo Nam, Mun Jung Ko, Soo Kyung Bok, Nam-Jong Paik, Chi-Yeon Lim, Jin Won Lee, Bum Sun Kwon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yeon Gyo NamInstitute of Posture Science, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.
Mun Jung KoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Soo Kyung BokDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Jong PaikDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chi-Yeon LimDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Jin Won LeeHMH Co. Ltd, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Bum Sun KwonInstitute of Posture Science, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. bskwon@dumc.or.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromechanical-assisted gait training may be an effective intervention to promote motor recovery after brain injury. However, many studies still have difficulties in clarifying the difference between electromechanical-assisted gait training and conventional gait training. To evaluate the effectiveness of electromechanical-assisted gait training compared to that of conventional gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry of stroke patients. We randomly assigned patients with stroke (n = 144) to a control group (physical therapist-assisted gait training) and an experimental group (electromechanical gait training). Both types of gait training were done for 30 min each day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in functional ambulatory category (FAC). Secondary endpoints were clinical walking functions and gait symmetries of swing time and step length. All outcomes were measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 4 weeks after the baseline (post-intervention). FAC showed significant improvement after the intervention, as did clinical walking functions, in both groups. The step-length asymmetry improved in the control group, but that in the experimental group and the swing-time asymmetry in both groups did not show significant improvement. In the subgroup analysis of stroke duration of 90 days, FAC and clinical walking functions showed more significant improvement in the subacute group than in the chronic group. However, gait symmetries did not show any significant changes in either the subacute or the chronic group. Electromechanically assisted gait training by EXOWALK was as effective as conventional gait training with a physiotherapist. Although clinical walking function in the subacute group improved more than in the chronic group, gait asymmetry did not improve for either group after gait training.Trial registration: KCT0003411 Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesStrokeStroke RehabilitationGaitHumansWalking

Identifiers

PMID35477986
PMCPMC9046288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.