Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477979›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2022

Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine.

Linda Camaj Deda, Rebecca H Goldberg, Taylor A Jamerson, Ivy Lee, Trilokraj Tejasvi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review of Teledermatology: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda Camaj Deda *University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rebecca H Goldberg *University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Taylor A JamersonUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ivy LeePasadena Premier Dermatology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Trilokraj TejasviDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ttejasvi@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-8711

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING IN HEALTH PROF SCHOOLST35HL007690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAHERTY, KEVIN R · 1990 to 2024
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teledermoscopy, or the utilization of dermatoscopic images in telemedicine, can help diagnose dermatologic disease remotely, triage lesions of concern (i.e., determine whether in-person consultation with a dermatologist is necessary, biopsy, or reassure the patient), and monitor dermatologic lesions over time. Handheld dermatoscopes, a magnifying apparatus, have become a commonly utilized tool for providers in many healthcare settings and professions and allows users to view microstructures of the epidermis and dermis. This Dermoscopy Practice Guideline reflects current knowledge in the field of telemedicine to demonstrate the correct capture, usage, and incorporation of dermoscopic images into everyday practice.

Identifiers

PMID35477979
PMCPMC9046409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.