Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477879›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Impact of endometriosis on women's life decisions and goal attainment: a cross-sectional survey of members of an online patient community.

Stacey A Missmer, Frank Tu, Ahmed M Soliman, Stephanie Chiuve, Sarah Cross, Samantha Eichner, Oscar Antunez Flores, Andrew Horne, Beth Schneider, Sawsan As-Sanie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. How Women with Endometriosis Use Social Media for Support and Self-Management: An Analysis of Reddit Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. New concepts on the etiology of endometriosis.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA stacey.missmer@channing.harvard.edu.
Frank TuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Ahmed M SolimanAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stephanie ChiuveAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sarah CrossAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Samantha EichnerAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Oscar Antunez FloresAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrew HorneMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-493X
Beth SchneiderMyHealthTeams, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sawsan As-SanieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-1979
AbbVie (United States) · USHarvard University · USMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBNorthShore University HealthSystem · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine women's perceptions of endometriosis-associated disease burden and its impact on life decisions and goal attainment.

designAn anonymous online survey was distributed in October 2018 through the social media network MyEndometriosisTeam.com.

participantsWomen aged 19 years and older living in several English-speaking countries who self-identified as having endometriosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' perspectives on how endometriosis has affected their work, education, relationships, overall life decisions and attainment of goals. Subanalyses were performed for women who identified as 'less positive about the future' (LPAF) or had 'not reached their full potential' (NRFP) due to endometriosis.

results743 women completed the survey. Women reported high levels of pain when pain was at its worst (mean score, 8.9 on severity scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)) and most (56%, n=415) experienced pain daily. Women reported other negative experiences attributed to endometriosis, including emergency department visits (66%, n=485), multiple surgeries (55%, n=406) and prescription treatments for symptoms of endometriosis (72%, n=529). Women indicated that they believed endometriosis had a negative impact on their educational and professional achievements, social lives/relationships and overall physical health. Most women 'somewhat agreed'/'strongly agreed' that endometriosis caused them to lose time in life (81%, n=601), feel LPAF (80%, n=589) and feel they had NRFP (75%, n=556). Women who identified as LPAF or NRFP generally reported more negative experiences than those who were non-LPAF or non-NRFP.

conclusionsWomen who completed this survey reported pain and negative experiences related to endometriosis that were perceived to negatively impact major life-course decisions and attainment of goals. Greater practitioner awareness of the impact that endometriosis has on a woman's life course and the importance of meaningful dialogue with patients may be important for improving long-term management of the disease and help identify women who are most vulnerable.

Indexed as

EndometriosisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGoalsHumansPainQuality of Lifecommunity gynaecologygynaecologyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35477879
PMCPMC9047767
OpenAlexW4225083785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.