Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477864›Full record

ReviewGut2022

Recent advances in clinical practice: management of inflammatory bowel disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Simeng Lin, Louis Hs Lau, Neil Chanchlani, Nicholas A Kennedy, Siew C Ng

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Twenty-Five-Year Trends in Mortality Associated withMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reply.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simeng Lin *Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4201-4879
Louis Hs Lau *Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4163-4531
Neil Chanchlani *Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0207-6706
Nicholas A KennedyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-1961
Siew C NgDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China siewchienng@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-4454
University of Exeter · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised considerable concerns that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly those treated with immunosuppressive therapies, may have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition, develop worse outcomes following COVID-19, and have suboptimal vaccine response compared with the general population. In this review, we summarise data on the risk of COVID-19 and associated outcomes, and latest guidance on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with IBD. Emerging evidence suggests that commonly used medications for IBD, such as corticosteroids but not biologicals, were associated with adverse outcomes to COVID-19. There has been no increased risk of de novo, or delayed, IBD diagnoses, however, an overall decrease in endoscopy procedures has led to a rise in the number of missed endoscopic-detected cancers during the pandemic. The impact of IBD medication on vaccine response has been a research priority recently. Data suggest that patients with IBD treated with antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) medications had attenuated humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and more rapid antibody decay, compared with non-anti-TNF-treated patients. Reassuringly, rates of breakthrough infections and hospitalisations in all patients who received vaccines, irrespective of IBD treatment, remained low. International guidelines recommend that all patients with IBD treated with immunosuppressive therapies should receive, at any point during their treatment cycle, three primary doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines with a further booster dose as soon as possible. Future research should focus on our understanding of the rate of antibody decay in biological-treated patients, which patients require additional doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, the long-term risks of COVID-19 on IBD disease course and activity, and the potential risk of long COVID-19 in patients with IBD.

Indexed as

COVID-19Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesChronic DiseaseCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesantibodyCOVID-19Crohn's diseaseimmune responseinflammatory bowel diseaseSARS-CoV-2ulcerative colitisvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35477864
PMCPMC9185820
OpenAlexW4225088793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.