Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477845›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2022

A Review of the Effectiveness of Current US Policies on Antimicrobial Use in Meat and Poultry Production.

David Wallinga, Lidwien A M Smit, Meghan F Davis, Joan A Casey, Keeve E Nachman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David WallingaNatural Resources Defense Council, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
Lidwien A M SmitInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Meghan F DavisDepartment of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room W-7007, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Joan A CaseyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10034, USA.
Keeve E NachmanDepartment of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room W-7007, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. knachman@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-4151

Funding

Antimicrobial resistant E. coli before and after California Senate bill 27 (ARES): a natural experimentR01AI130066 · NIAID · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TARTOF, SARA · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130066Wellcome Trust 211493/Z/18/Z/
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndustrial food animal production accounts for most animal-source protein consumed in the USA. These operations rely on an array of external inputs, which can include antimicrobials of medical importance. The use of these drugs in this context has been the subject of public health debate for decades because their widespread use contributes to the selection for and proliferation of drug-resistant bacteria and their genetic determinants. Here, we describe legislative and regulatory efforts, at different levels of governance in the USA, to curtail food animal consumption of medically important antimicrobials. RECENT

findingsThe features and relative success of the US efforts are examined alongside those of selected member states (Denmark and the Netherlands) of the European Union. Evaluation of efforts at all levels of US governance was complicated by shortcomings in prescribed data collection; nevertheless, available information suggests deficiencies in policy implementation and enforcement compromise the effectiveness of interventions pursued to date. The political will, robust systems for collecting and integrating data on antimicrobial consumption and use, and cross-sectoral collaboration that have been integral to the success of efforts in Denmark and The Netherlands have been notably absent in the USA, especially at the federal level.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsPoultryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMeatPolicyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobial use, Food animal productionDrug resistance, MicrobialLivestockOne HealthPolicy

Identifiers

PMID35477845
PMCPMC9090690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.