Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477737›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comprehensive human amniotic fluid metagenomics supports the sterile womb hypothesis.

HanChen Wang, Gui Xiang Yang, Yuxiang Hu, Patricia Lam, Karan Sangha, Dawn Siciliano, Anne Swenerton, Ruth Miller, Peter Tilley, Peter Von Dadelszen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Window to the Womb: Amniotic Fluid and Postnatal Outcomes.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

HanChen WangDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gui Xiang YangDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yuxiang HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Patricia LamDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Karan SanghaDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dawn SicilianoDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Anne SwenertonDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ruth MillerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Peter TilleyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Peter Von DadelszenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shirin KalyanDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Patrick TangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Millan S PatelBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mpatel@cw.bc.ca.

Funding

CIHR 130494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As metagenomic approaches for detecting infectious agents have improved, each tissue that was once thought to be sterile has been found to harbor a variety of microorganisms. Controversy still exists over the status of amniotic fluid, which is part of an immunologically privileged zone that is required to prevent maternal immune system rejection of the fetus. Due to this privilege, the exclusion of microbes has been proposed to be mandatory, leading to the sterile womb hypothesis. Since nucleic acid yields from amniotic fluid are very low, contaminating nucleic acid found in water, reagents and the laboratory environment frequently confound attempts to address this hypothesis. Here we present metagenomic criteria for microorganism detection and a metagenomic method able to be performed with small volumes of starting material, while controlling for exogenous contamination, to circumvent these and other pitfalls. We use this method to show that human mid-gestational amniotic fluid has no detectable virome or microbiome, supporting the sterile womb hypothesis.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaNucleic AcidsAmniotic FluidFemaleHumansMetagenomicsUterusNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35477737
PMCPMC9046152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.