Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477720›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Changes to the gut microbiota of a wild juvenile passerine in a multidimensional urban mosaic.

Öncü Maraci, Michela Corsini, Anna Antonatou-Papaioannou, Sebastian Jünemann, Joanna Sudyka, Irene Di Lecce, Barbara A Caspers, Marta Szulkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of urbanisation on social behaviour: a comprehensive review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Öncü MaraciDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33619, Bielefeld, Germany. oncu.maraci@uni-bielefeld.de.
Michela CorsiniCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha Street 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Antonatou-PapaioannouEvolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sebastian JünemannFaculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Joanna SudykaCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha Street 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Irene Di LecceCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha Street 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara A CaspersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33619, Bielefeld, Germany.
Marta SzulkinCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha Street 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Bielefeld University · DEUniversity of Warsaw · PLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanisation is a major anthropogenic perturbation presenting novel ecological and evolutionary challenges to wild populations. Symbiotic microorganisms residing in the gastrointestinal tracts (gut) of vertebrates have mutual connections with host physiology and respond quickly to environmental alterations. However, the impact of anthropogenic changes and urbanisation on the gut microbiota remains poorly understood, especially in early development. To address this knowledge gap, we characterised the gut microbiota of juvenile great tits (Parus major) reared in artificial nestboxes and in natural cavities in an urban mosaic, employing two distinct frameworks characterising the urban space. Microbial diversity was influenced by cavity type. Alpha diversity was affected by the amount of impervious surface surrounding the breeding location, and positively correlated with tree cover density. Community composition differed between urban and rural sites: these alterations covaried with sound pollution and distance to the city centre. Overall, the microbial communities reflect and are possibly influenced by the heterogeneous environmental modifications that are typical of the urban space. Strikingly, the choice of framework and environmental variables characterising the urban space can influence the outcomes of such ecological studies. Our results open new perspectives to investigate the impact of microbial symbionts on the adaptive capacity of their hosts.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaPasseriformesAnimalsCitiesPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID35477720
PMCPMC9046431
OpenAlexW4225091432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.