ArticleBMC medical ethics2022
Asking the right questions: towards a person-centered conception of shared decision-making regarding treatment of advanced chronic kidney disease in older patients.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Developing a tool to facilitate person-centered care in a university hospital in collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Choosing Dialysis Modalities for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Review
- Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease: A Key to Personalized Care and Shared Decision-Making-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mind the gap in kidney care: translating what we know into what we do.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Skills to act from a Positive Health approach: in comparison with shared decision-making: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Mind the gap in kidney care: Translating what we know into what we do.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Article
- Communicating treatment options to older patients with advanced kidney disease: a conversation analysis study.BMC nephrology · 2024Observational
- Person-Centered Care Planning for People Living With or at Risk for Multiple Chronic Conditions.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Shared decision-making in end-of-life care for end-stage renal disease patients: nephrologists' views and attitudes.Israel journal of health policy research · 2024Article
- Mind the gap in kidney care: translating what we know into what we do.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2024Review
- Views, attitudes, and reported practices of nephrology nurses regarding shared decision-making in end-of-life care.Nursing ethics · 2024Article
- Mind the Gap in Kidney Care: Translating What We Know Into What We Do.American journal of hypertension · 2024Article
- Mind the Gap in Kidney Care: Translating What We Know into What We Do.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Mind the gap in kidney care: Translating what we know into what we do.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Shared decision making in elderly patients with kidney failure.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024Review
- Exploring health and disease concepts in healthcare practice: an empirical philosophy of medicine study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Getting to Know Your Patient: Content Analysis of Patients' Answers to a Questionnaire for Promoting Person-Centered Care.Journal of participatory medicine · 2024Article
- Mind the Gap in Kidney Care: Translating What We Know into What We Do.Blood purification · 2024Article
- Mind the Gap in Kidney Care: Translating What We Know Into What We do.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increasing number of older patients have to decide on a treatment plan for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), involving dialysis or conservative care. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended as the model for decision-making in such preference-sensitive decisions. The aim of SDM is to come to decisions that are consistent with the patient's values and preferences and made by the patient and healthcare professional working together. In clinical practice, however, SDM appears to be not yet routine and needs further implementation. A shift from a biomedical to a person-centered conception might help to make the process more shared. Shared should, therefore, be interpreted as two persons bringing two perspectives to the table, that both need to be explored during the decision-making process. Starting from the patient's perspective will enable to determine the mutual goals of care first and, subsequently, determine the best way for achieving those goals. To perform such SDM, the healthcare professional needs to become a skilled companion, being part of the patient's relational context, and start asking the right questions about what matters to the patient as person. In this article, we describe the need for a person-centered conception of SDM for the setting of older patients with advanced CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.