Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477440›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Implementation rate and effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on decision making about radiotherapy: an observational study at a single Japanese institution.

Mayumi Ichikawa, Ken Uematsu, Natsuko Yano, Masayoshi Yamada, Takashi Ono, Shohei Kawashiro, Hiroko Akamatsu, Yasuhito Hagiwara, Hiraku Sato, Kenji Nemoto

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mayumi IchikawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan. ichimayu0712@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-3371
Ken UematsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Natsuko YanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Masayoshi YamadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Takashi OnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Shohei KawashiroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Hiroko AkamatsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Yasuhito HagiwaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Hiraku SatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Kenji NemotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Yamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. Therefore, multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) have been widely used to determine the direction of treatment. However, no standard provisions exist for conducting MDTMs, and recommendations discussed in MDTMs are sometimes not implemented. ​This study analyzed the indications for radiotherapy discussed and recommended at MDTMs, identified the rate of radiotherapy recommendations for patients that were not implemented, and clarified the reasons at a single academic center in Japan.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study that analyzed the minutes and electronic medical records of cases discussed at MDTMs held between April 2012-March 2017 at Yamagata University Hospital. We categorized how radiotherapy was initially presented at MDTMs, determined the rate of radiotherapy recommendations made through MDTMs, analyzed whether treatment recommendations were subsequently implemented, and examined the causes of non-implementation. We performed a statistical analysis to assess some clinical factors (sex, age, number of multidisciplinary team meetings, and classification of planned treatment) associated with the non-implementation of radiotherapy recommendations from MDTMs.

resultsA total of 1813 cases were discussed at MDTMs, of which 71% (1293 cases) were presented with treatment plans, including radiotherapy. Further, 66% (1205 cases) were recommended for radiotherapy through the MDTMs. Recommendations from MDTMs were not implemented in 7% (142 cases). The most typical reason for non-implementation was the clinician's opinion (30%), followed by patient preferences (27%) and disease progression (20%). Change in cancer stage and improvement in symptoms were 12% and 4%, respectively. These ratios were similar each year. We could not find the factors associated with the non-implementation of radiotherapy recommendations from MDTMs.

conclusionsMDTMs had a significant effect on the recommendation of radiotherapy for each patient with a tumor. The primary reason for the non-implementation of decisions made at MDTMs was the opinion of clinicians and the patient's preference. These results were similar to previous studies. We need to establish a monitoring system where patients themselves can decide the treatments based on their choices while using the recommendations from MDTMs.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesPatient Care TeamCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingHumansJapanCancerDecision makingMultidisciplinary team meetingsOncologyRadiotherapyTumor board

Identifiers

PMID35477440
PMCPMC9044833
OpenAlexW4224921940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.