ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
Long-term follow-up of a case of Coats disease in a 10-year-old boy with spontaneous peeling of preretinal macular fibrosis: a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous separation of epiretinal membrane associated with retinal hemangioblastoma: a case report with 10-year follow-up.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- Spontaneous epiretinal membrane resolution: mechanisms, outcomes, and implications for clinical management.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Long-term efficacy and complications of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents combined with ablative therapies in juvenile Coats disease: a five year follow-up study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoats disease is a retinal vascular disorder characterized by aneurysms and telangiectasias. Macular fibrosis is a complication of Coats disease that results in vision loss. Macular fibrosis rarely develops in the natural course and often occurs after treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab, photocoagulation, or cryotherapy. Here, we have described an unusual case of spontaneous peeling of preretinal macular fibrosis in a patient with untreated Coats disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 10-year-old Japanese boy presented with vision loss in his left eye. The patient's left visual acuity was 20/28. Fundus examination of his left eye revealed thick preretinal macular fibrosis around the optic disc and macula. In addition, retinal telangiectasis, microaneurysms, hard exudates, and retinal hemorrhages were observed in the left peripheral temporal retina. We diagnosed his condition as Coats disease with preretinal macular fibrosis. Two months later, optical coherence tomography revealed preretinal macular fibrosis detachment at the foveal lesion without any treatment. During follow-up, preretinal macular fibrosis at the macular lesion was completely detached. Further, posterior vitreous detachment was observed and the shape of the macula and the patient's left visual acuity had improved.
conclusionsIn our case, both formation and spontaneous peeling of preretinal macular fibrosis occurred without any treatment for Coats disease, which is an unusual finding. Vitreous changes might have occurred during the natural clinical course, causing subsequent posterior vitreous detachment and resulting in spontaneous peeling of fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.