Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35477380›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2022

HIP Fracture REhabilitation Program for older adults with hip fracture (HIP-REP) based on activity of daily living: a feasibility study.

Alice Røpke, Anne-Le Morville, Trine Elleby Møller, Emma Cæcilie Guttzeit Delkus, Carsten Bogh Juhl

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03828240 (HIP Fracture REhabilitation Programme for Elderly With Hip Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03828240 nacompletednot on this map

HIP Fracture REhabilitation Programme for Elderly With Hip Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorHerlev and Gentofte HospitalRan2019 to 2019Enrolled18ConditionsHip FracturesArmsHIP fracture REhabilitation Programme for the elderly with hip fractures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice RøpkeDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. aliceropke@me.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-5558
Anne-Le MorvilleADULT Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Trine Elleby MøllerMunicipality of Gentofte, Municipality of Gentofte's Centre for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emma Cæcilie Guttzeit DelkusCenter for Training and Rehabilitation, Municipality of Lyngby-Taarbaek, Lyngby-Taarbaek, Denmark.
Carsten Bogh JuhlDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKGentofte Hospital · DKJönköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA Rehabilitation Program for older adults with hip fracture (HIP-REP) based on Activity of Daily Living has been developed. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility and safety of the HIP-REP program to inform a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).

methodsA feasibility study Inspired by the Complex-intervention development (Medical Research Council framework phase II) design using quantitative and qualitative research methods were conducted. Eighteen participants (above 65 years) with hip fracture were recruited from the orthopedic wards. The setting was cross sectoral including Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte and rehabilitation centers in Herlev, Gentofte and Lyngby-Taarbæk municipalities. A cross-sectoral rehabilitation intervention tailored to the needs of older adults with hip fracture highlighting systematic goal setting and strategies focused on activities of daily living was conducted. Pre-defined feasibility criteria: participants recruitment and retention, duration of measuring the outcome, adherence to intervention, and adverse events, along with self-reported outcomes and an objective measurement of performance in activity of daily living. Focus groups were analyzed using a deductive manifest content analysis approach. Descriptive statistical analysis and paired t-tests were performed for assessing change in outcome measures.

resultsRecruitment rate was 4.5/month. Outcome measures were performed but length and number of questionnaires were a burden. Thirteen out of eighteen participants completed the study three dropped out and two died. Adherence among the 13 was 100%. Focus group revealed issues regarding coordinating the intervention, ensuring procedural processes across sectors regarding recruitment of participants, and documentation in the database. Participants expressed satisfaction with the intervention and felt safe during intervention. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills showed better increase between (range 0.4 to 1.6) in ADL motor ability measures and better increase between (range 0.4 to 0.7) for process ability. No clear association between outcome improvements and intervention adherence.

conclusionsThe cross-sectoral intervention based on daily activities was feasible and safe for older adults with hip fracture. A future RCT, with an improved recruitment strategy and reduced number of outcome measures will evaluate the effectiveness in improving independence and safety performance of activity of daily living.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03828240 . Registered on January 29, 2019.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesActivities of Daily LivingAgedFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsHumansADLFracturesHipPilot studyRehabilitationTask performance and analysis

Identifiers

PMID35477380
PMCPMC9044869
OpenAlexW4224944725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.