ArticlePloS one2022
Machine learning for passive mental health symptom prediction: Generalization across different longitudinal mobile sensing studies.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a systematic review of diagnosis, monitoring, and intervention applications.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Harnessing digital health interventions to address the heterogeneity of depression: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Multimodal Mental Health Detection: A Systematic Review of Passive Sensing Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Phenotyping of Lifestyle Profiles and Mental Well-Being in German Adults: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Introducing openESM: A database of openly available experience sampling datasets.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Methodological guidance on clinical prediction models in mental health research.Psychological medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence and online learning in youth mental health: a scoping review.Npj mental health research · 2026Review
- Variability in self-reported depression symptomology and associated behavioral markers in digital phenotyping.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of the Interaction Between Screen Time and Activity Interests on Adolescent Depression Risk: Construction of a Predictive Model Based on Machine Learning.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in schizophrenia rehabilitation management: a systematic scoping review.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Balancing Privacy and Utility in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Research: Retrospective Cohort Study on Synthetic Data Generation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Uncovering the determinants of infant and toddler childcare demand in less-developed rural China: a machine learning perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI-enabled passive digital phenotyping of experiential negative symptoms in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a narrative review on the path from sensing to clinical endpoints.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Detecting Perceived Unfair Treatment Among US College Students Using Mobile Sensing: Pilot Machine Learning Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A Co-Segmentation Algorithm to Predict Emotional Stress From Passively Sensed mHealth Data.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- A systematic review of passive data for remote monitoring in psychosis and schizophrenia.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A literature review of remote mental health screening: barriers, potential solutions, and tools.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Design Guidelines for Improving Mobile Sensing Data Collection: Prospective Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Beyond Detection: Towards Actionable Sensing Research in Clinical Mental Healthcare.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024Article
- Measuring algorithmic bias to analyze the reliability of AI tools that predict depression risk using smartphone sensed-behavioral data.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mobile sensing data processed using machine learning models can passively and remotely assess mental health symptoms from the context of patients' lives. Prior work has trained models using data from single longitudinal studies, collected from demographically homogeneous populations, over short time periods, using a single data collection platform or mobile application. The generalizability of model performance across studies has not been assessed. This study presents a first analysis to understand if models trained using combined longitudinal study data to predict mental health symptoms generalize across current publicly available data. We combined data from the CrossCheck (individuals living with schizophrenia) and StudentLife (university students) studies. In addition to assessing generalizability, we explored if personalizing models to align mobile sensing data, and oversampling less-represented severe symptoms, improved model performance. Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV) results were reported. Two symptoms (sleep quality and stress) had similar question-response structures across studies and were used as outcomes to explore cross-dataset prediction. Models trained with combined data were more likely to be predictive (significant improvement over predicting training data mean) than models trained with single-study data. Expected model performance improved if the distance between training and validation feature distributions decreased using combined versus single-study data. Personalization aligned each LOSO-CV participant with training data, but only improved predicting CrossCheck stress. Oversampling significantly improved severe symptom classification sensitivity and positive predictive value, but decreased model specificity. Taken together, these results show that machine learning models trained on combined longitudinal study data may generalize across heterogeneous datasets. We encourage researchers to disseminate collected de-identified mobile sensing and mental health symptom data, and further standardize data types collected across studies to enable better assessment of model generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.