ArticleRhode Island medical journal (2013)2022
Single- vs. Multi-Item Assessment of Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents.
Article in Rhode Island medical journal (2013), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Automated Coding of Nonverbal Behavior During a Suicide Assessment to Inform Risk Detection: Mixed Cross-Sectional and Exploratory Prospective Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the SuPr-10 questionnaire for suicidality assessment in primary care patients with depressive symptoms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Suicide risk, protective factors, and interventions for young people in out-of-home care: a scoping review.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Elementary School-Aged Youth: A Pilot Study in 5- to 10-Year-Olds.JAACAP open · 2025Article
- Life is precious: A quasi-experimental study of a community-based program to prevent suicide among Latina adolescents in New York City.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Article
- Associations among intimate partner violence, suicidal ideation, suicide behaviors, non-suicidal self-injury, and psychological well-being in Black American emerging adults.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Article
- Negative affect influences suicide-specific attentional biases.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2024Article
- Do people know how suicidal they will be? Understanding suicidal prospection.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2024Article
- Acculturation and suicide-related risk in ethnoracially minoritized youth in the US: a scoping review and content analysis of the empirical evidence.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2023Article
- Structural Racism and Adolescent Mental Health Disparities in Northern California.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Future Directions in Understanding and Interpreting Discrepant Reports of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Youth.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Article
- Differences in Reporting Suicide Ideation and Attempt: Implications for Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Several barriers exist to routine assessment of suicidal ideation (SI) in adolescents across settings, including insufficient time, tools, and training. Such barriers often result in the use of brief or even single-item assessments of SI, which may result in misclassification. The present study sought to compare single- and multi-item assessment of SI in adolescents, and to examine factors associated with different response profiles. Adolescents (n =206) were recruited from the community and completed a lab visit including a single and multi-item assessment for SI. Results suggest that two thirds of adolescents with passive SI go undetected when relying solely on a single-item screener, yet they present a similar clinical profile to those with passive SI who endorse the screener question. The present study provides support for the notion that multi-item assessment paints a more accurate, nuanced picture of SI among adolescents and may be an important component of routine screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35476730PMC13041232W4225089148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.