Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35476711›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Consumer attitudes and concerns with bioplastics use: An international study.

Walter Leal Filho, Jelena Barbir, Ismaila Rimi Abubakar, Arminda Paço, Zaneta Stasiskiene, Marie Hornbogen, Maren Theresa Christin Fendt, Viktoria Voronova, Marija Klõga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Walter Leal FilhoHamburg University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Research and Transfer Centre "Sustainable Development & Climate Change Management" (FTZ-NK), Hamburg, Germany.
Jelena BarbirHamburg University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Research and Transfer Centre "Sustainable Development & Climate Change Management" (FTZ-NK), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-0680
Ismaila Rimi AbubakarCollege of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (formerly, University of Dammam), Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-2302
Arminda PaçoUniversity of Beira Interior, Department of Management and Economics, Núcleo de Estudos em Ciências Empresariais (NECEUBI), Rua Marquês d'Ávila e Bolama, Covilhã, Portugal.
Zaneta StasiskieneKaunas University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Marie HornbogenHamburg University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Research and Transfer Centre "Sustainable Development & Climate Change Management" (FTZ-NK), Hamburg, Germany.
Maren Theresa Christin FendtHamburg University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Research and Transfer Centre "Sustainable Development & Climate Change Management" (FTZ-NK), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5133-1067
Viktoria VoronovaTallinn University of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn, Estonia.
Marija KlõgaTallinn University of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world production of plastic exceeded 360 million tonnes in 2020 alone, a considerable amount of which is not properly disposed of. The significant pressures and damages posed by conventional plastic to human and environmental health suggest that alternatives are urgently needed. One of them is "bioplastic", which is defined as bio-based plastic that is (or not) biodegradable. This paper reports on a study on the perceptions of bioplastics among consumers in 42 countries to identify their levels of information and concerns. The results suggest that most respondents have positive expectations regarding the future of bioplastics to replace conventional plastics fully or partially, especially for food containers, kitchenware, and boxes and bags for packaging. They also reported that the low costs and increased availability of bioplastic products on the market are likely to be the main drivers for their wide-scale adoption. However, many participants are unsure whether they would buy bio-based and biodegradable products if they are expensive. Overall, whereas a rather positive attitude to bioplastics has been identified, greater efforts are needed to address the many information needs of consumers towards upscaling the adoption of bioplastics. Relevant policies are therefore needed to encourage investments in the large-scale manufacture and market uptake of bioplastics. The paper reports on an initial study of consumer behavior, in a sample of countries spread across all geographical regions.

Indexed as

Food PackagingPlasticsAttitudeConsumer BehaviorHumansPlastics

Identifiers

PMID35476711
PMCPMC9045599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.