Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35476709›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Thai adults during the first three epidemic waves.

Hatairat Lerdsamran, Anek Mungaomklang, Sopon Iamsirithaworn, Jarunee Prasertsopon, Witthawat Wiriyarat, Suthee Saritsiri, Ratikorn Anusorntanawat, Nirada Siriyakorn, Poj Intalapaporn, Somrak Sirikhetkon and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hatairat LerdsamranCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Anek MungaomklangInstitute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sopon IamsirithawornDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Jarunee PrasertsoponCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Witthawat WiriyaratFaculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Suthee SaritsiriThe 67th Public Health Center Thaweewatthana, Department of Health, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ratikorn AnusorntanawatChaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health, Suphanburi, Thailand.
Nirada SiriyakornRajavithi Hospital, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Poj IntalapapornRajavithi Hospital, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somrak SirikhetkonInstitute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kantima SangsiriwutDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worawat DangsakulDepartment of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Suteema SawadpongpanCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Nattakan ThinpanCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Kuntida KitideeCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Pilailuk OkadaDepartment of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Ranida TechasuwannaDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Noparat MongkalangoonDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Kriengkrai PrasertNakhon Phanom Provincial Hospital, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.
Pilaipan PuthavathanaCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5481-9156
Ministry of Public Health · THMahidol University · THBangkok Metropolitan Administration · THNakhon Phanom University · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study determined the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 4964 individuals, comprising 300 coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) prepandemic serum samples, 142 COVID-19 patients, 2113 individuals at risk due to their occupations, 1856 individuals at risk due to sharing workplaces or communities with COVID-19 patients, and 553 Thai citizens returning after spending extended periods of time in countries with a high disease prevalence. We recruited participants between May 2020 and May 2021, which spanned the first two epidemic waves and part of the third wave of the COVID-19 outbreaks in Thailand. Their sera were tested in a microneutralization and a chemiluminescence immunoassay for IgG against the N protein. Furthermore, we performed an immunofluorescence assay to resolve discordant results between the two assays. None of the prepandemic sera contained anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while antibodies developed in 88% (15 of 17) of the COVID-19 patients at 8-14 days and in 94-100% of the patients between 15 and 60 days after disease onset. Neutralizing antibodies persisted for at least 8 months, longer than IgG antibodies. Of the 2113 individuals at risk due to their occupation, none of the health providers, airport officers, or public transport drivers were seropositive, while antibodies were present in 0.44% of entertainment workers. Among the 1856 individuals at risk due to sharing workplaces or communities with COVID-19 patients, seropositivity was present in 1.9, 1.5, and 7.5% of the Bangkok residents during the three epidemic waves, respectively, and in 1.3% of the Chiang Mai people during the first epidemic wave. The antibody prevalence varied between 6.5 and 47.0% in 553 Thai people returning from high-risk countries. This serosurveillance study found a low infection rate of SARS-CoV-2 in Thailand before the emergence of the Delta variant in late May 2021. The findings support the Ministry of Public Health's data, which are based on numbers of patients and contact tracing.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesThailandAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID35476709
PMCPMC9045619
OpenAlexW4225846760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.