ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Learning the rules of collective cell migration using deep attention networks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inverse Statistics of Active Matter Trajectories to Distinguish Interaction Kernel Anisotropy from Emergent Correlations.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- MultiCell: geometric learning in multicellular development.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Identification of neural crest and melanoma cancer cell invasion and migration genes using high-throughput screening and deep attention networks.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026Article
- Inflammasomes meet organoids and artificial intelligence: unraveling the complexity of gynecological inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Engineering Cellular Self-Adhesions Inside 3D Printed Micro-Arches to Enhance Cell:Biomaterial Attachment.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Electrotaxis disrupts patterns of cell-cell interactions of human corneal epithelial cells in vitro.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Learning collective cell migratory dynamics from a static snapshot with graph neural networks.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Self-extinguishing relay waves enable homeostatic control of human neutrophil swarming.Developmental cell · 2024Article
- Article
- Machine learning meets physics: A two-way street.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Migrate3D: Software for simplified post-tracking analysis of 3D and 2D cell migration data.Research square · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Collective, coordinated cellular motions underpin key processes in all multicellular organisms, yet it has been difficult to simultaneously express the 'rules' behind these motions in clear, interpretable forms that effectively capture high-dimensional cell-cell interaction dynamics in a manner that is intuitive to the researcher. Here we apply deep attention networks to analyze several canonical living tissues systems and present the underlying collective migration rules for each tissue type using only cell migration trajectory data. We use these networks to learn the behaviors of key tissue types with distinct collective behaviors-epithelial, endothelial, and metastatic breast cancer cells-and show how the results complement traditional biophysical approaches. In particular, we present attention maps indicating the relative influence of neighboring cells to the learned turning decisions of a 'focal cell'-the primary cell of interest in a collective setting. Colloquially, we refer to this learned relative influence as 'attention', as it serves as a proxy for the physical parameters modifying the focal cell's future motion as a function of each neighbor cell. These attention networks reveal distinct patterns of influence and attention unique to each model tissue. Endothelial cells exhibit tightly focused attention on their immediate forward-most neighbors, while cells in more expansile epithelial tissues are more broadly influenced by neighbors in a relatively large forward sector. Attention maps of ensembles of more mesenchymal, metastatic cells reveal completely symmetric attention patterns, indicating the lack of any particular coordination or direction of interest. Moreover, we show how attention networks are capable of detecting and learning how these rules change based on biophysical context, such as location within the tissue and cellular crowding. That these results require only cellular trajectories and no modeling assumptions highlights the potential of attention networks for providing further biological insights into complex cellular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.