Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2022
Nasal High-Flow Therapy during Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The IntubAID Study - Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation During Neonatal Nasal Intubation
Application of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) in Burn Children With Suspected Difficult Airway:A Single-center, Randomized Controlled Study
SEALion: a Study on the Effectiveness of Additional Oxygenation in Little Children During Intubation Using Oxygenation Delivered by Nasal Cannula
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to improve neonatal and infant intubation success: a meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Respiratory support during endotracheal intubation to improve intubation success in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Video laryngoscopy in neonate and infant intubation-a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Respiratory Stabilization for Successful Intubation in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian pediatrics · 2026Trial
- High-flow Nasal Oxygenation in Infants Undergoing Tracheal Intubation: A Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Non-Invasive respiratory support during elective intubation in preterm infants-a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Alternative consent processes in a neonatal resuscitation trial (SAIL): secondary analysis of an open-label, international, multicentre, randomised trial.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2025Trial
- Coaching inexperienced clinicians before a high stakes medical procedure: randomized clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Trial
- Video versus direct laryngoscopy to improve the success rate of nasotracheal intubations in the neonatal intensive care setting: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ paediatrics open · 2023Trial
- Nasal high-flow therapy to Optimise Stability during Intubation: the NOSI pilot trial.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2023Trial
- EBNEO Commentary: Impact of Attending Neonatologist Presence on Neonatal Intubation Success and Adverse Events: A Cohort Study.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Pragmatic Respiratory Stabilization During Neonatal Intubation-What Does this Trial Add for Indian NICUs?Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of attending neonatologist presence on neonatal intubation success and adverse events: a cohort study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Complementary views: addressing blind spots in the direct versus video laryngoscopy debate.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Patient and public involvement (PPI) reporting in maternal and neonatal clinical trials: an exploratory review.Trials · 2026Review
- Impact of attending neonatologist presence on neonatal intubation success and adverse events: a cohort study.Research square · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal endotracheal intubation often involves more than one attempt, and oxygen desaturation is common. It is unclear whether nasal high-flow therapy, which extends the time to desaturation during elective intubation in children and adults receiving general anesthesia, can improve the likelihood of successful neonatal intubation on the first attempt.
methodsWe performed a randomized, controlled trial to compare nasal high-flow therapy with standard care (no nasal high-flow therapy or supplemental oxygen) in neonates undergoing oral endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Randomization of intubations to the high-flow group or the standard-care group was stratified according to trial center, the use of premedication for intubation (yes or no), and postmenstrual age of the infant (≤28 or >28 weeks). The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability (defined as an absolute decrease in the peripheral oxygen saturation of >20% from the preintubation baseline level or bradycardia with a heart rate of <100 beats per minute) in the infant.
resultsThe primary intention-to-treat analysis included the outcomes of 251 intubations in 202 infants; 124 intubations were assigned to the high-flow group and 127 to the standard-care group. The infants had a median postmenstrual age of 27.9 weeks and a median weight of 920 g at the time of intubation. A successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability was achieved in 62 of 124 intubations (50.0%) in the high-flow group and in 40 of 127 intubations (31.5%) in the standard-care group (adjusted risk difference, 17.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.0 to 29.2), for a number needed to treat of 6 (95% CI, 4 to 17) for 1 infant to benefit. Successful intubation on the first attempt regardless of physiological stability was accomplished in 68.5% of the intubations in the high-flow group and in 54.3% of the intubations in the standard-care group (adjusted risk difference, 15.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.3 to 27.3).
conclusionsAmong infants undergoing endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units, nasal high-flow therapy during the procedure improved the likelihood of successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability in the infant. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618001498280.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.