Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35476523›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Ctenophores are direct developers that reproduce continuously beginning very early after hatching.

Allison Edgar, José Miguel Ponciano, Mark Q Martindale

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid speciation in the holopelagic ctenophorebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Reverse development in the ctenophoreProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Brief History of Ctenophora.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Are we there yet to eliminate the terms larva, metamorphosis, and dissogeny from the ctenophore literature?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Reply to Soto-Angel et al.: Is "larva" a natural kind? Phylogenetic thinking provides clarity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allison EdgarThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL 32080.ORCID 0000-0002-5993-9106
José Miguel PoncianoDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0001-8457-7840
Mark Q MartindaleThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL 32080.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-5640
Whitney Museum of American Art · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial body of literature reports that ctenophores exhibit an apparently unique life history characterized by biphasic sexual reproduction, the first phase of which is called larval reproduction or dissogeny. Whether this strategy is plastically deployed or a typical part of these species’ life history was unknown. In contrast to previous reports, we show that the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi does not have separate phases of early and adult reproduction, regardless of the morphological transition to what has been considered the adult form. Rather, these ctenophores begin to reproduce at a small body size and spawn continuously from this point onward under adequate environmental conditions. They do not display a gap in productivity for metamorphosis or other physiological transition at a certain body size. Furthermore, nutritional and environmental constraints on fecundity are similar in both small and large animals. Our results provide critical parameters for understanding resource partitioning between growth and reproduction in this taxon, with implications for management of this species in its invaded range. Finally, we report an observation of similarly small-size spawning in a beroid ctenophore, which is morphologically, ecologically, and phylogenetically distinct from other ctenophores reported to spawn at small sizes. We conclude that spawning at small body size should be considered as the default, on-time developmental trajectory rather than as precocious, stress-induced, or otherwise unusual for ctenophores. The ancestral ctenophore was likely a direct developer, consistent with the hypothesis that multiphasic life cycles were introduced after the divergence of the ctenophore lineage.

Indexed as

CtenophoraAnimalsFemaleLarvaLife Cycle StagesParturitionPregnancyReproductionctenophoredissogenylarval reproductionlife history evolutionMnemiopsis leidyi

Identifiers

PMID35476523
PMCPMC9170174
OpenAlexW4224952105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.