Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35476457›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2022

Evaluation of the Success of High-Throughput Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (HT-PBPK) Modeling Predictions to Inform Early Drug Discovery.

Doha Naga, Neil Parrott, Gerhard F Ecker, Andrés Olivares-Morales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ADMET & DMPK · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Predicting tissue distribution and tumor delivery of nanoparticles in mice using machine learning models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Doha NagaRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.
Neil ParrottRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.
Gerhard F EckerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4209-6883
Andrés Olivares-MoralesRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-0810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimizing in vitro and in vivo testing in early drug discovery with the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and machine learning (ML) approaches has the potential to reduce discovery cycle times and animal experimentation. However, the prediction success of such an approach has not been shown for a larger and diverse set of compounds representative of a lead optimization pipeline. In this study, the prediction success of the oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters in rats was assessed using a "bottom-up" approach, combining in vitro and ML inputs with a PBPK model. More than 240 compounds for which all of the necessary inputs and PK data were available were used for this assessment. Different clearance scaling approaches were assessed, using hepatocyte intrinsic clearance and protein binding as inputs. In addition, a novel high-throughput PBPK (HT-PBPK) approach was evaluated to assess the scalability of PBPK predictions for a larger number of compounds in drug discovery. The results showed that bottom-up PBPK modeling was able to predict the rat IV and PO PK parameters for the majority of compounds within a 2- to 3-fold error range, using both direct scaling and dilution methods for clearance predictions. The use of only ML-predicted inputs from the structure did not perform well when using in vitro inputs, likely due to clearance miss predictions. The HT-PBPK approach produced comparable results to the full PBPK modeling approach but reduced the simulation time from hours to seconds. In conclusion, a bottom-up PBPK and HT-PBPK approach can successfully predict the PK parameters and guide early discovery by informing compound prioritization, provided that good in vitro assays are in place for key parameters such as clearance.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryModels, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationHepatocytesMetabolic Clearance RatePharmacokineticsRatsclearance predictions and machine learningdrug discoveryHT-PBPKPBPK modelsphysicochemical properties

Identifiers

PMID35476457
PMCPMC9257750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.