Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35476302›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2022

Antimicrobial Biocides Susceptibility and Tolerance-Associated Genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolates Collected from Human and Environmental Sources.

Malek Namaki Kheljan, Roghayeh Teymorpour, Hadi Peeri Doghaheh, Mohsen Arzanlou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The mobilome landscape of biocide-resistance in Brazilian ESKAPE isolates.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk exploration and prediction model construction for linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis based on big data in a province in southern China.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. UnravelingMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malek Namaki KheljanDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Roghayeh TeymorpourDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Hadi Peeri DoghahehDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Mohsen ArzanlouDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran. m.arzanlou@arums.ac.ir.
Ardabil University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci are among the most common causes of nosocomial infections worldwide. Antimicrobial biocides are extensively used to control the growth of microorganisms on different surfaces. The purpose of this study was to determine the susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates collected in Iran to biocide agents, formaldehyde (FOR), benzalkonium chloride (BZC), triclosan (TRE), and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHDG). Additionally, the frequency of biocide tolerance-associated (BTA) genes, qacA/B, qacED1, emeA, sigV and gasp65 were investigated. In this study, 222 isolates of E. faecalis and 425 isolates of E. faecium from clinical and non-clinical sources were investigated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of biocide agents was determined using agar dilution method. Biocides epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) were determined using 95% rule. BTA genes were identified using PCR testing. ECOFFs for CHDG, BZC, TRE and FOR were 8 µg/mL, 16 µg/mL, 32 µg/mL and 512 µg/mL for both species, respectively. MIC values showed that the distribution of isolates with high level of tolerance to antimicrobial biocides was clearly different, depending on ecological niches. The BTA genes, qacA/B, qacED1, emeA, sigV and gasp65 were detected in 19.4% (43), 19.8% (44), 42.8% (95), 89.6% (199) and 70.2% (156) of E. faecalis and 10.3% (44), 17.2% (73), 27.8% (118), 42.2% (188) and 82.8% (352) of E. faecium isolates, respectively. Based on the distribution pattern of BTA genes 14 and 18 different profiles were identified for E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates respectively. Generally, the isolates carrying at least a single BTA gene showed higher MIC

Indexed as

DisinfectantsEnterococcus faeciumAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnterococcusEnterococcus faecalisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisinfectants

Identifiers

PMID35476302
OpenAlexW4224922025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.