ArticleDermatology and therapy2022
Real-Life Effectiveness of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomised, Double-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of the Biosimilar Ustekinumab FYB202 with Reference Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- Modulation of Nuclear Factor Kappa B Signaling and microRNA Profiles by Adalimumab in LPS-Stimulated Keratinocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Pediatric Psoriasis: A Multi-Center International Experience.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Biosimilars for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Increasing Access to Effective Systemic Treatments in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis has rarely been investigated.
objectiveTo investigate drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and factors associated with its discontinuation.
methodsWe carried out a retrospective observational study including all consecutive patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who initiated adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio), ABP501 (Amgevita), or SB5 (Imraldi) between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2021. The 1-year drug survival of adalimumab biosimilar and independent factors associated with its discontinuation were investigated. Cox regression models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of adalimumab discontinuation. A propensity score matching (PSM) model was adopted as sensitivity analysis.
resultsThe study involved a total of 410 patients with follow-up of 549.84 person-years, 271 (66.1%) men, a mean (SD) age of 51.8 (14.5) years, and a baseline PASI of 14.54 (5.02). Among adalimumab biosimilars, 250 (61%) patients received MSB11022, 98 (24%) received ABP501, and 62 (15%) received SB5. Drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars at 1 year was 81.5% in the overall study population. Obesity was associated with increased risk of adalimumab discontinuation (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.33-3.03), whereas psoriatic arthritis (aHR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.16-0.64) and receiving adalimumab as first systemic treatment (aHR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.70) were associated with lower risk.
conclusionThe real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis is consistent with that previously reported for the originator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.