Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35476010›Full record

ReviewRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2022

Skin injuries due to Personal Protective Equipment and preventive measures in the COVID-19 context: an integrative review.

Lorrany Fontenele Moraes da Silva, Alana Gomes de Araujo Almeida, Lívia Maia Pascoal, Marcelino Santos Neto, Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima, Floriacy Stabnow Santos

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lorrany Fontenele Moraes da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Imperatriz, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-4969
Alana Gomes de Araujo AlmeidaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Naturais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Pinheiro, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4411-0354
Lívia Maia PascoalUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Imperatriz, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-3996
Marcelino Santos NetoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Imperatriz, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6105-1886
Francisca Elisângela Teixeira LimaUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-6947
Floriacy Stabnow SantosUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Imperatriz, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-7642
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRCoordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · BRNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto identify the diverse scientific evidence on the types of skin lesions caused due to the use of Personal Protective Equipment in health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the recommended prevention measures.

methodthis is an integrative review carried out in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Web of Science and SciELO databases. The search was conducted in a paired manner, constituting a sample of 17 studies categorized according to the types of skin lesions and preventive measures.

resultsthe main types of skin lesions related to mask use were stage 1 pressure ulcers, acne and cutaneous depression. Regarding the use of glasses and face shields, the most frequent were stage 1 and 2 pressure ulcers. Xerosis and irritant contact dermatitis occurred due to using gloves and protective clothing, respectively. The main preventive measures recommended were using hydrocolloid or foam dressing in the pressure regions, moisturizers and emollients.

conclusiona considerable number of skin lesions associated with using the equipment were noticed, and the data obtained can guide the professionals in identifying risks and promoting preventive measures to avoid their occurrence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pressure UlcerSkin DiseasesHumansPandemicsPersonal Protective Equipment

Identifiers

PMID35476010
PMCPMC9019902
OpenAlexW4225935077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.