Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35475671›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

The Use of Disinfectant in Barn Cleaning Alters Microbial Composition and Increases Carriage of

Yi Fan, Andrew J Forgie, Tingting Ju, Camila Marcolla, Tom Inglis, Lynn M McMullen, Benjamin P Willing, Douglas R Korver

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. AdultCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi FanDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Andrew J ForgieDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Tingting JuDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Camila MarcollaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Tom InglisThe Institute of Applied Poultry Technologies, Airdrie, Alberta, Canada.
Lynn M McMullenDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Benjamin P WillingDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4285-4728
Douglas R KorverDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Albertagrid.17089.37, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To maintain food safety and flock health in broiler chicken production, biosecurity approaches to keep chicken barns free of pathogens are important. Canadian broiler chicken producers must deep clean their barns with chemical disinfectants at least once annually (full disinfection [FD]) and may wash with water (water wash [WW]) throughout the year. However, many producers use FD after each flock, assuming a greater efficacy of more stringent cleaning protocols, although little information is known regarding how these two cleaning practices affect pathogen population and gut microbiota. In the present study, a crossover experiment over four production cycles was conducted in seven commercial chicken barns to compare WW and FD. We evaluated the effects of barn cleaning methods on commercial broiler performance, cecal microbiota composition, Campylobacter and Salmonella occurrence, and Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens abundance, as well as on short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in the month-old broiler gut. The 30-day body weight and mortality rate were not affected by the barn cleaning methods. The WW resulted in a modest but significant effect on the structure of broiler cecal microbiota (weighted-UniFrac; adonis

Indexed as

Campylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniDisinfectantsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsBody WeightCanadaChickensWaterDisinfectantsWaterbarn disinfectionbroiler chickengut microbiotapathogen

Identifiers

PMID35475671
PMCPMC9128520
OpenAlexW4226399394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.