ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
Methodological evaluation of individual cognitive prediction based on the brain white matter structural connectome.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental changes of the white matter functional connectome.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Altered structural connectivity in white matter lesion-induced mild cognitive impairment: a probabilistic fiber tracking and graph theory analysis.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
- The Shape of the Brain's Connections Is Predictive of Cognitive Performance: An Explainable Machine Learning Study.Human brain mapping · 2025Review
- Prediction of Verbal Abilities From Brain Connectivity Data Across the Lifespan Using a Machine Learning Approach.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Weak and unstable prediction of personality from the structural connectome.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Spatial and temporal pattern of structure-function coupling of human brain connectome with development.eLife · 2024Article
- TractGeoNet: A geometric deep learning framework for pointwise analysis of tract microstructure to predict language assessment performance.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Differential predictability of cognitive profiles from brain structure in older males and females.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Spatial and temporal pattern of structure-function coupling of human brain connectome with development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Prediction of cognitive performance differences in older age from multimodal neuroimaging data.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Weighting the structural connectome: Exploring its impact on network properties and predicting cognitive performance in the human brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- TractoSCR: a novel supervised contrastive regression framework for prediction of neurocognitive measures using multi-site harmonized diffusion MRI tractography.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Different patterns of structural network impairments in two amyotrophic lateral sclerosis subtypes driven byBrain communications · 2024Article
- Longitudinal development of the human white matter structural connectome and its association with brain transcriptomic and cellular architecture.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Methodological evaluation of individual cognitive prediction based on the brain white matter structural connectome.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An emerging trend is to use regression-based machine learning approaches to predict cognitive functions at the individual level from neuroimaging data. However, individual prediction models are inherently influenced by the vast options for network construction and model selection in machine learning pipelines. In particular, the brain white matter (WM) structural connectome lacks a systematic evaluation of the effects of different options in the pipeline on predictive performance. Here, we focused on the methodological evaluation of brain structural connectome-based predictions. For network construction, we considered two parcellation schemes for defining nodes and seven strategies for defining edges. For the regression algorithms, we used eight regression models. Four cognitive domains and brain age were targeted as predictive tasks based on two independent datasets (Beijing Aging Brain Rejuvenation Initiative [BABRI]: 633 healthy older adults; Human Connectome Projects in Aging [HCP-A]: 560 healthy older adults). Based on the results, the WM structural connectome provided a satisfying predictive ability for individual age and cognitive functions, especially for executive function and attention. Second, different parcellation schemes induce a significant difference in predictive performance. Third, prediction results from different data sets showed that dMRI with distinct acquisition parameters may plausibly result in a preference for proper fiber reconstruction algorithms and different weighting options. Finally, deep learning and Elastic-Net models are more accurate and robust in connectome-based predictions. Together, significant effects of different options in WM network construction and regression algorithms on the predictive performances are identified in this study, which may provide important references and guidelines to select suitable options for future studies in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.