Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35475151›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2022

Characterization of fecal microbiome in biopsy positive prostate cancer patients.

Ran Katz, Muhamad Abu Ahmed, Ali Safadi, Wasiem Abu Nasra, Alexander Visoki, Michael Huckim, Ibrahim Elias, Meital Nuriel-Ohayon, Hadar Neuman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Behind the scenes.BJUI compass · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ran KatzDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-7055
Muhamad Abu AhmedDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.
Ali SafadiDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.
Wasiem Abu NasraDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.
Alexander VisokiDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.
Michael HuckimDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.
Ibrahim EliasDepartment of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel.
Meital Nuriel-OhayonAzrieli Faculty of Medicine Bar-Ilan University Safed Israel.
Hadar NeumanMedical Research Center Ziv Medical Center and Zefat Academic College Safed Israel.
Rebecca Sieff Hospital · ILBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the fecal microbiome in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. Patients and methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients who were referred for trans rectal prostate biopsy were tested. Patients who received antibiotics 3 months prior to the biopsy, patients with history of pelvic irradiation, prostate or colon cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and urinary tract infection were excluded. A rectal swab was obtained just prior to the biopsy, immediately placed in a sterile tube and kept in -80°C. Sequencing was performed for the 16S rRNA 515F + 806R gene fragment using the QIIME2 software. Analytic tests included Beta diversity (Weighted Unifrac, Unweighted Unifrac, Bray-Curtis), Alpha diversity (Faith, Evenness), Taxa bar plots and PCoA plots. Results: Forty-five samples were suitable for analysis with at least 8000 readings per sample. All patients were Caucasian. Twenty patients had prostate cancer and 25 had benign prostates (BPH). Among prostate cancer patients, Gleason Score was 3 + 3 in 11 patients, 3 + 4 in 5, 4 + 3 in 3, and 4 + 4 in 2. There was no statistical difference in demographic parameters between the groups. We identified over 1000 bacterial species, typical for the colonic microbiome. No significant differences in bacterial populations were found between prostate cancer versus benign prostate patients nor between age groups or between subgroups of Gleason or International Society of Uro-pathology (ISUP) scores. Conclusions: Although the microbiome has previously been shown to have an impact on the human microenvironment and cancer risk, we could not demonstrate a significant difference between the flora diversity of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients and BPH patients. Further research into distinct bacterial metabolic pathways may reveal unique risk factors for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

bacterial diversityfecal floramicrobiomeprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35475151
PMCPMC8988526
OpenAlexW3196834192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.