ArticleBJUI compass2022
Characterization of fecal microbiome in biopsy positive prostate cancer patients.
Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiota in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring the Gut-Prostate Axis: Microbial Signatures Linked to Prostate Volume and Bladder Function.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Inflammatory bowel disease and prostate cancer: from epidemiological controversy to mechanistic hypotheses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gut-prostate axis in prostate cancer: microbiome signatures, mechanistic insights, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The Urogenital System Microbiota: Is It a New Gamechanger in Urogenital Cancers?Microorganisms · 2025Review
- A Holistic Approach to Hard-to-Treat Cancers: The Future of Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, and Advanced Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Investigating the oral microbiome in retrospective and prospective cases of prostate, colon, and breast cancer.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- Stabilization of Acne Vulgaris-Associated Microbial Dysbiosis with 2% Supramolecular Salicylic Acid.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Characterization of fecal microbiome in biopsy positive prostate cancer patients.BJUI compass · 2022Article
- Structural and functional characteristics of soil microbial communities in response to different ecological risk levels of heavy metals.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Behind the scenes.BJUI compass · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize the fecal microbiome in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. Patients and methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients who were referred for trans rectal prostate biopsy were tested. Patients who received antibiotics 3 months prior to the biopsy, patients with history of pelvic irradiation, prostate or colon cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and urinary tract infection were excluded. A rectal swab was obtained just prior to the biopsy, immediately placed in a sterile tube and kept in -80°C. Sequencing was performed for the 16S rRNA 515F + 806R gene fragment using the QIIME2 software. Analytic tests included Beta diversity (Weighted Unifrac, Unweighted Unifrac, Bray-Curtis), Alpha diversity (Faith, Evenness), Taxa bar plots and PCoA plots. Results: Forty-five samples were suitable for analysis with at least 8000 readings per sample. All patients were Caucasian. Twenty patients had prostate cancer and 25 had benign prostates (BPH). Among prostate cancer patients, Gleason Score was 3 + 3 in 11 patients, 3 + 4 in 5, 4 + 3 in 3, and 4 + 4 in 2. There was no statistical difference in demographic parameters between the groups. We identified over 1000 bacterial species, typical for the colonic microbiome. No significant differences in bacterial populations were found between prostate cancer versus benign prostate patients nor between age groups or between subgroups of Gleason or International Society of Uro-pathology (ISUP) scores. Conclusions: Although the microbiome has previously been shown to have an impact on the human microenvironment and cancer risk, we could not demonstrate a significant difference between the flora diversity of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients and BPH patients. Further research into distinct bacterial metabolic pathways may reveal unique risk factors for prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.