ArticleHuman reproduction open2022
Uterine fluid cytokine/chemokine levels of women undergoing ART with and without oral Vitamin D supplementation.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical potential of fluid-based biomarkers for recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- MIG-6 Plays a Critical Role as a PGR Mediator in Maintaining Epithelial and Stromal Cells for Uterine Receptivity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- Women's fertility and vitamin D: Could hypovitaminosis D biomarkers correlate with the disease, and explain the unexplained female factor infertility?African health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionIs oral Vitamin D supplementation able to modify the intrauterine milieu in terms of cytokine/chemokine pattern? SUMMARY ANSWER: No significant differences were detected in cytokine and chemokine levels in endometrial secretions between patients undergoing ART with or without Vitamin D supplementation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cytokines and chemokines secreted into the intrauterine environment are fundamental for the molecular crosstalk between the endometrium and the preimplantation embryo. Whether Vitamin D can regulate these mediators in the endometrial environment is still unclear. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This study was an analysis of a secondary outcome from the Supplementation of Vitamin D and Reproductive Outcomes-SUNDRO-clinical trial, a multicenter randomized double-blinded trial designed to explore the effects of Vitamin D replacement in women with Vitamin D levels below 30 ng/ml undergoing autologous ART cycles. Uterine fluid samples were collected from both patients supplemented with Vitamin D (n PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsBased on cutoff points for Vitamin D insufficiency (20-29.9 ng/ml) or deficiency (<20 ng/ml), 67% of patients in the study were insufficient, and 33% deficient, in Vitamin D, although they were considered together for the analysis. Women received a single dose of 600 000 IU 25-hydroxyvitamin D or placebo from 2 to 12 weeks before oocyte retrieval. Inclusion criteria were female age 18-39 years, with a BMI between 18 and 25 kg/m MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Uterine fluid samples were collected after a median (range) of 21 (12-41) days after the oral Vitamin D supplementation. Both the supplemented and placebo groups had Vitamin D serum levels below 30 ng/ml at baseline/time of randomization ((median 23.4 ng/ml (interquartile range 19.5-28.4) and 23.4 ng/ml (17.8-25.9), respectively). At the time of hCG administration, serum Vitamin D in supplemented subjects was significantly raised compared to the placebo group ((median 52.9 ng/ml (interquartile range 40.7-64.1) and 24.6 ng/ml (19.3-29.2), respectively, LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Using a randomized study design (a single dose of 600 000 IU 25-hydroxyvitamin D versus placebo), we found no significant differences between groups. However, we cannot exclude that any benefit of Vitamin D supplementation may be specific for some subgroups of patients, such as those with an imbalance of T-helper 1 and T-helper 2 cell populations. The uterine secretions were collected during the menstrual cycle that preceded oocyte retrieval; therefore, it is possible the uterine fluid collection and analysis in the same cycle of the embryo transfer might have resulted in different conclusions. Moreover, the small sample size could limit the power of the study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsOur analysis of the uterine secretome profiling failed to show any significant difference in endometrial cytokine/chemokine patterns between women with oral Vitamin D supplementation and the placebo group. Vitamin D may act on the uterine environment through a different mechanism. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health following peer review in the competitive 'Bando di Ricerca Finalizzata e Giovani Ricercatori 2013' with reference code RF-2013-02358757. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT registration number: 2015-004233-27.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.