Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474939›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2020

Single-fraction image-guided robotic radiosurgery efficiently controls local prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

A Spek, A Graser, G Habl, A Muacevic, C Fuerweger, M Seitz, A Haidenberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Attention to detail.BJUI compass · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A SpekDepartment of Urology Ludwig Maximilian University Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0056-1230
A GraserRadiologie Muenchen Munich Germany.
G HablDepartment of Radiation Therapy Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
A MuacevicEuropean Cyberknife Center Munich Munich Germany.
C FuerwegerEuropean Cyberknife Center Munich Munich Germany.
M SeitzUroclinic Bogenhausen Munich Germany.
A HaidenbergerEuropean Cyberknife Center Munich Munich Germany.
Ihre-Radiologen · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the therapeutic potential of single-fraction robotic stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: We included 35 patients with biochemical failure after RP with single-site local recurrence in the prostate bed diagnosed by PSMA PET/CT. About 20/35 pts had previously received post-surgical adjuvant radiation therapy.High-resolution multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for exact visualization of tumor tissue was performed at 1.5 (n = 23; Siemens Magnetom Aera) or 3 Tesla (n = 12; Siemens Magnetom VIDA, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Using the MRI and PET/CT dataset for planning, SABR was carried out after ultrasound-guided placement of a single gold fiducial marker at the site of tumor recurrence using a CyberKnife M6 unit (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, USA). Due to the high diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI, pre-SABR biopsy of tumor tissue was not deemed necessary. PSMA PET/CT performed in median 88 days before SABR confirmed the absence of distant metastases. MpMRI was performed at a median of 22 days prior to the intervention. SABR was performed in a single fraction with a dose of 20 (5/35), 21 (27/35) or 22 (3/35) Gy. Follow-up serum PSA was measured every 3 months thereafter. Results: Median patient age was 72 years (57-80 years) and median time from RP to SABR was 96.8 months (IQR, 69.3-160.2). Median serum PSA before SABR was 1.38 ng/mL (IQR 0.75-2.72). At 3 months, median PSA had dropped significantly in 27/35 patients to a median of 0.35 ng/mL (IQR 0.25-0.68). At 6 months, 30/35 patients showed biochemical response to SABR, while five patients were progressing: three had systemic disease on PSMA PET/CT, while two patients had rising PSA values without a visible correlate on PET/CT. The median follow-up time was 16 months. Grade 1 genitourinary (GU) toxicity was reported in 3/35 patients (9%) and grade 1 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in 2/35 patients (6%), respectively. Conclusion: SABR is an efficient new treatment option in the management of single-site local recurrent PC without the evidence of systemic disease; due to its very low toxicity, it is an alternative to surgical re-treatment or other focal therapies. It can significantly delay the onset of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

prostate cancerprostatectomyPSArecurrenceSABR

Identifiers

PMID35474939
PMCPMC8988633
OpenAlexW3047203678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.