Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474877›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2021

Oncological outcomes of dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Tetsushi Murakami, Eiji Kikuchi, Hiroki Ide, Yuta Umezawa, Takayuki Takahashi, Mizuki Izawa, Kyohei Hakozaki, Keisuke Shigeta, Koichiro Ogihara, Hiroaki Kobayashi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Chasing the elusive goal.BJUI compass · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tetsushi MurakamiDepartment of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Eiji KikuchiDepartment of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-6676
Hiroki IdeDepartment of Urology Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yuta UmezawaDepartment of UroOncology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Takayuki TakahashiDepartment of UroOncology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Mizuki IzawaDepartment of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Kyohei HakozakiDepartment of Urology National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital Saitama Japan.
Keisuke ShigetaDepartment of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Koichiro OgiharaDepartment of Urology Kawasaki Municipal Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Urology Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Kunimitsu KanaiDepartment of Urology National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital Saitama Japan.
Takahiro MaedaDepartment of Urology Kawasaki Municipal Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Shunsuke YoshimineDepartment of Urology Saitama City Hospital Saitama Japan.
Ryuichi MizunoDepartment of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Koshiro NishimotoDepartment of UroOncology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction were associated with worse clinical outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients. Patients and methods: One hundred and fifty one metastatic UC patients who received first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) salvage chemotherapy without a previous history of peri-surgical chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Patients with endogenous creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min or more were treated with a full dose of cisplatin, while those with 45-59 and 30-44 mL/min were treated with 75% and 50% doses, respectively. Patients were divided into three groups based on the average administered dose of cisplatin of 100% (Group A, N = 43), 99%-75% (Group B, N = 59), and less than 75% (Group C, N = 49), and therapeutic responses and the toxicity of GC were compared. Results: Complete response rates were 9.3%, 13.6%, and 14.3% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. One-year progression-free survival rates were 22.9%, 31.1%, and 36.7% in groups A, B, and C with no significant differences. One-year cancer-specific survival rates were 56.1%, 71.1%, and 68.3% in groups A, B, and C with no significant differences. A multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that the dose of cisplatin was not an independent prognostic factor for disease progression and cancer death. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of severe adverse events. Conclusions: Dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction did not worsen clinical outcomes for metastatic UC.

Indexed as

cisplatin‐unfitGCmetastatic urothelial carcinomarenal failuresalvage chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35474877
PMCPMC8988766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.