Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474863›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2020

Virtual reality tumor navigated robotic radical prostatectomy by using three-dimensional reconstructed multiparametric prostate MRI and

Abdullah Erdem Canda, Sertac Fatih Aksoy, Emre Altinmakas, Ersin Koseoglu, Okan Falay, Yakup Kordan, Barbaros Çil, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Tarik Esen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdullah Erdem CandaDepartment of Urology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-653X
Sertac Fatih AksoyCollaboration Space Sabancı University Istanbul Turkey.
Emre AltinmakasDepartment of Radiology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.
Ersin KoseogluDepartment of Urology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.
Okan FalayDepartment of Nuclear Medicine School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.
Yakup KordanDepartment of Urology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.
Barbaros ÇilDepartment of Radiology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.
Mevlana Derya BalbayDepartment of Urology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.
Tarik EsenDepartment of Urology School of Medicine Koç University Istanbul Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use and benefits of tumor navigation during performing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: Borders of the visible tumor(s) was/were and surrounding structures marked on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Results: Mean patient age was 60.6 ± 3.7 years (range, 56-66). All VR models were finalized with the agreement of radiologist, urologist, nuclear physician, and engineer. Surgeon examined images before the surgery. All VR models were found very useful particularly in pT3 diseases. Pathological stages included pT2N0 (n = 1), pT3aN0 (n = 1), pT3aN1 (n = 2), and pT3bN1 (n = 1). Positive surgical margins (SMs) occurred in two patients with extensive disease (pT3aN1 and pT3bN1) and tumor occupied 30% and 50% of the prostate volumes. Mean estimated blood loss was 150 ± 86.6 cc (range, 100-300). Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 1.7 months (range, 2-6). No complication occurred during perioperative (0-30 days) and postoperative (30-90 days) periods in any patient. Conclusions: 3D reconstructed VR models by using mpMRI and Ga68 PSMA-PET/CT images can be accurately prepared and effectively applied during RARP that might be a useful tool for tumor navigation. Images show prostate tumors and anatomy and might be a guide for the console surgeon. This is promising new technology that needs further study and validation.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionaugmented realityradical prostatectomyrobotictrainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35474863
PMCPMC8988524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.