ArticleACS omega2022
A Simple and Precise Estimation of Water Sliding Angle by Monitoring Image Brightness: A Case Study of the Fluid Repellency of Commercial Face Masks.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functionalization of Textile Materials for Advanced Engineering Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Fluorinated Graphene-Coated N95 Respirators for Enhanced Protection Against Viral Accumulation and Transmission.Advanced engineering materials · 2025Article
- Effect of free liquid layer quantity on bacteria and protein adhesion to liquid infused polymers.Biointerphases · 2024Article
- Different weathering conditions affect the release of microplastics by masks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Article
- Advances in the Fabrication and Characterization of Superhydrophobic Surfaces Inspired by the Lotus Leaf.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid repellency of a hydrophobic surface has been typically demonstrated in terms of water sliding angle. A drop shape analysis method with a written computer algorithm monitoring the image brightness was proposed to precisely estimate the sliding angle. A hydrophobic surface coated with silanized silicon dioxide or polytetrafluoroethylene was selected as a known sample for the method validation. Average pixel brightness in an 8-bit grayscale unit rapidly increased after a water drop rolled off the surface, thus removing its black pixels. The resulting sliding angle was then determined as the tilt angle of the sample stage related to the sliding time at the brightness leap. The optimized angular speed of the rotor at 0.1 degrees per frame was chosen to avoid an overestimation of the sliding angle due to the deceleration. The proposed method yielded accurate sliding angles with an error of less than 0.2 degrees. It was then applied to study the fluid resistance of commercial face masks including disposable surgical masks and reusable fabric masks. It was found that the outermost layer of the single-use surgical masks can moderately repel a water drop with a sliding angle of 49.4 degrees. Meanwhile, the pre-coated fabric masks retained high protection efficiency at a sliding angle of less than 45 degrees after about 20 wash cycles. In addition, a raw muslin fabric coated with a commercial water-repellent spray could be a promising and affordable alternative to the surgical mask during the pandemic with high water repellency even after a few washes. The results suggested that, besides the hydrophobicity indicated by the typical contact angle, the precise sliding angle estimated by the proposed alternative method could additionally provide crucial information that might lead to a detailed discussion of the fluid repellency of rough materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.