Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474825›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Chemometric Analysis of NMR Spectra and Machine Learning to Investigate Membrane Fouling.

Daiki Yokoyama, Sosei Suzuki, Taiga Asakura, Jun Kikuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deconvolution and Analysis of theJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daiki YokoyamaRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Sosei SuzukiGraduate School of Medical Life Science, Yokohama City University, 1-7-29 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Taiga AsakuraRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Jun KikuchiRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-394X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient membrane filtration requires the understanding of the membrane foulants and the functional properties of different membrane types in water purification. In this study, dead-end filtration of aquaculture system effluents was performed and the membrane foulants were investigated via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Several machine learning models (Random Forest; RF, Extreme Gradient Boosting; XGBoost, Support Vector Machine; SVM, and Neural Network; NN) were constructed, one to predict the maximum transmembrane pressure, for revealing the chemical compounds causing fouling, and the other to classify the membrane materials based on chemometric analysis of NMR spectra, for determining their effect on the properties of the different membrane types tested. Especially, RF models exhibited high accuracy; the important chemical shifts observed in both the regression and classification models suggested that the proportional patterns of sugars and proteins are key factors in the fouling progress and the classification of membrane types. Therefore, the proposed strategy of chemometric analysis of NMR spectra is suitable for membrane research, which aims at investigating comprehensively the fouling phenomenon and how the foulants and environmental conditions vary according to the filtration systems.

Identifiers

PMID35474825
PMCPMC9025983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.