Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474756›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Efficacy and Safety of Carbapenems vs New Antibiotics for Treatment of Adult Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Yukiko Ezure, Veronica Rico, David L Paterson, Lisa Hall, Patrick N A Harris, Alex Soriano, Jason A Roberts, Matteo Bassetti, Matthew J Roberts, Elda Righi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Yukiko EzureThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Veronica RicoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
David L PatersonThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Lisa HallSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Patrick N A HarrisThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Alex SorianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9374-0811
Jason A RobertsThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Clinic, Hospital Policlinico San Martino-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-9740
Matthew J RobertsThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Elda RighiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Hugh WrightThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of carbapenems for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), with the comparators being new antibiotics evaluated for this indication. We searched 13 electronic databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and completed and/or ongoing trials. The search terms were developed using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study framework. Pooled efficacy estimates of composite cure (clinical success and microbiological eradication) favored the new antibiotic groups, although this was not statistically significant (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.04). A pooled estimate examining clinical response alone showed no difference between treatment arms (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05), however, new antibiotic treatments were superior to carbapenems for microbiological response (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91). New antibiotic treatments demonstrated a superior microbiological response compared with carbapenems in clinical trials of cUTI, despite an absence of carbapenem resistance. However, it is noteworthy that the clinical response and safety profile of new antibiotics were not different from those of carbapenems.

Indexed as

carbapenemcomplicated urinary tract infectionsefficacy and safetynew antibioticssystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35474756
PMCPMC9031024
OpenAlexW3092071308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.